Design and experimental study of two types of low jitter self-triggered switches under nanosecond pulse voltage
-
摘要: 降低纳秒脉冲电压下气体开关的抖动对电磁脉冲模拟装置输出稳定性具有重要意义。特别在受条件约束、外触发不便的条件下，自触发开关抖动的降低值得关注。设计了两种自触发开关，包含阴极刻槽开关和预电离开关，并搭建了纳秒脉冲实验平台，分别在40 ns、70 ns 与120 ns三种脉冲前沿下测量了两种开关的击穿电压、时延等参数，通过数据统计与处理，获得了两种开关的击穿电压及时间抖动。实验结果表明：通过阴极刻槽控制发射或者阴极预电离注入的方式均可有效降低开关的击穿抖动；在三种前沿的脉冲电压下两种开关的击穿抖动均在1～1.8 ns之间；在40 ns和70 ns前沿脉冲作用下，阴极刻槽的开关击穿抖动更低，可小于1.2 ns，击穿电压分散性小于1.29%；在120 ns前沿脉冲作用下，阴极预电离开关击穿抖动更低，可小于1.6 ns。Abstract: It is important to reduce the jitter of gas switch under nanosecond pulse voltage for the output stability of electromagnetic pulse simulator. Especially under the condition that external triggering is inconvenient, the reduction of the jitter of self-triggered switch is worth paying attention to. In this paper, two types of self-triggered switches are designed, including the cathode grooved switch and the preionization switch. A nanosecond pulse experimental platform was built and the breakdown voltage, time delay and other parameters of the two types of switches are measured at three different pulse rise time of 40 ns, 70 ns and 120 ns respectively. With the use of data statistics and processing, the breakdown voltage and time jitter of the two switches are obtained. The experimental results show that the breakdown jitter of the switch can be effectively reduced by cathode grooved control emission or cathode preionization injection; The jitters of the two switches are between 1～1.8 ns under three rise time pulse voltages; Under the rise time of 40 ns and 70 ns pulses, the jitter of cathode grooved switch is shorter, which can be less than 1.2 ns, and the breakdown voltage dispersion is less than 1.29%; Under rise time of 120 ns pulse, the jitter of preionization switch is shorter than 1.6 ns.
-
Key words:
- nanosecond pulse /
- self-triggered switch /
- low jitter /
- preionization /
- grooved electrode
-
图 1 刻槽自触发开关与预电离自触发开关结构图
Figure 1. Structure diagram of grooved self-triggered switch and preionization self-triggered switch
图 3 预电离自触发开关等效电路及仿真波形
Figure 3. Equivalent circuit and simulation waveforms of the preionization self-triggered switch
图 4 实验平台示意图( 1:6级Marx发生器, 2:调波电感, 3:自击穿气体开关, 4:电阻分压器, 5:间隔盆形绝缘子, 6:实验腔体)
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of experimental platform (1: 6-stage Marx generator, 2: wave regulating inductance, 3: self breaking gas switch, 4: resistance voltage divider, 5: spacing basin insulator, 6: experimental chamber)
图 5 Marx等效电路及开关电压仿真波形
Figure 5. Marx equivalent circuit and switching voltage simulation waveforms
图 7 40 ns，70 ns与120 ns前沿下刻槽开关的击穿时延与电压
Figure 7. Breakdown delay and voltage of the cathode grooved switch at 40 ns, 70 ns and 120 ns rise time
图 8 40 ns，70 ns与120ns前沿下预电离开关的击穿时延与电压
Figure 8. Breakdown delay and voltage of the preionization switch at 40 ns, 70 ns and 120 ns rise time
图 9 70 ns与120 ns前沿的三种开关抖动对比
Figure 9. Comparison of three kinds of switch jitter at the rise time of 70ns and 120ns
表 1 刻槽开关击穿特性数据(抖动与电压分散性)
Table 1. Cathode grooved switch breakdown characteristic data (voltage dispersion and jitter)
p/MPa voltage
dispersion/%breakdown time
delay jitter/nsp/MPa voltage
dispersion/%breakdown time
delay jitter/nsp/MPa voltage
dispersion/%breakdown time
delay jitter/nstr=～40 ns tr=～70 ns tr=～120 ns 0.70 0.85 1.08 0.65 1.06 1.18 0.64 1.22 1.84 0.84 0.93 1.11 0.80 0.82 0.90 0.80 0.89 1.76 1.00 0.83 1.03 0.95 0.99 1.07 0.98 1.02 1.75 1.16 1.29 0.86 1.06 0.75 0.91 1.22 1.18 1.77 1.27 1.01 0.87 1.24 0.88 1.05 1.38 1.03 1.47 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 预电离开关击穿特性数据(抖动与电压分散性)
Table 2. Preionization switch breakdown characteristic data (voltage dispersion and jitter)
p/MPa voltage
dispersion/%breakdown time
delay jitter/nsp/MPa voltage
dispersion/%breakdown time
delay jitter/nsp/MPa voltage
dispersion/%breakdown time
delay jitter/nstr=～40 ns tr=～70 ns tr=～120 ns 0.74 0.79 1.34 0.71 1.27 1.48 0.69 1.37 1.60 0.88 1.08 1.32 0.81 1.26 1.56 0.80 1.00 1.39 1.04 1.02 1.21 0.93 0.84 1.04 0.91 0.97 1.52 1.13 0.74 0.84 1.04 1.04 1.12 1.04 1.35 1.57 1.25 0.77 0.89 1.18 1.25 1.40 1.17 1.26 1.59
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 邵涛, 孙广生, 严萍, 等. 纳秒脉冲气体放电机理研究现状[J]. 高电压技术, 2004, 30(7):40-42 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6520.2004.07.017Shao Tao, Sun Guangsheng, Yan Ping, et al. Overview of nanosecond-pulse gas breakdown mechanics[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2004, 30(7): 40-42 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6520.2004.07.017 [2] 邵涛, 严萍, 张适昌, 等. 纳秒脉冲气体放电机理探讨[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2008, 20(11):1928-1932Shao Tao, Yan Ping, Zhang Shichang, et al. Review on nanosecond-pulse discharge mechanism in gases[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2008, 20(11): 1928-1932 [3] 刘锡三. 高功率脉冲技术[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2005Liu Xisan. High pulsed power technology[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2005 [4] 赵智大. 高电压技术[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2013Zhao Zhida. High voltage technique[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2013 [5] 丁培, 丁健刚, 姚晓飞, 等. 雷电冲击电压下串联空气球隙击穿特性[J]. 高电压技术, 2021, 47(11):4072-4077 doi: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20200620Ding Pei, Ding Jian’gang, Yao Xiaofei, et al. Breakdown characteristics of series connected ball air gaps under lightening impulse voltage[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2021, 47(11): 4072-4077 doi: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20200620 [6] Gilman C, Lam S K, Naff J T, et al. Design and performance of the FEMP-2000: a fast risetime, 2 MV EMP pulser[C]//Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference. 1999: 1437-1440. [7] Wang Tianchi, Du Yingchao, Chen Wei, et al. A low-jitter self-triggered spark-discharge pre-ionization switch: primary research on its breakdown characteristics and working mechanisms[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2021, 23: 115508. doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac2420 [8] 李俊娜, 邱爱慈, 蒯斌, 等. 自耦式紫外预电离开关特性[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2008, 20(6):994-998Li Junna, Qiu Aici, Kuai Bin, et al. Characteristics of capacitance-resistance coupling UV illumination switch[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2008, 20(6): 994-998 [9] Ramirez J J. Effect of electrode surface conditions on the self-breakdown strength and jitter of a high-pressure pulsed gas switch[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1976, 47(5): 1925-1928. doi: 10.1063/1.322914 [10] Levinson S J, Kunhardt E E. Investigation of the statistical and formative time lags associated with the breakdown of a gas in a gap at high overvoltage[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 1982, 10(4): 266-270. doi: 10.1109/TPS.1982.4316187 [11] 程新兵, 刘金亮, 陈蒸, 等. 高电压长寿命型气体火花开关的设计及初步研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2008, 20(10):1753-1756Cheng Xinbing, Liu Jinliang, Chen Zheng, et al. Design and primary experiment of high voltage long-life gas spark switch[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2008, 20(10): 1753-1756 [12] 李黎, 鲍超斌, 冯希波, 等. 纳秒快脉冲下气体开关的过电压击穿[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33(7):185-191 doi: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.2013.07.025Li Li, Bao Chaobin, Feng Xibo, et al. Overvoltage breakdown of air-insulated gap under fast nanosecond-pulse[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(7): 185-191 doi: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.2013.07.025 [13] Martin T H. Pulsed charged gas breakdown[C]//Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Pulsed Power Conference. 1985: 74-83. [14] Martin T H. An empirical formula for gas switch breakdown delay[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Pulsed Power Conference. 1989: 73-79. [15] 严璋, 朱德恒. 高电压绝缘技术[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2015Yan Zhang, Zhu Deheng. High voltage insulation technology[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2015 [16] 李俊娜, 何石, 邱爱慈, 等. 自触发开关在不同脉冲前沿下的击穿特性[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48(4):1590-1596 doi: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20210393Li Junna, He Shi, Qiu Aici, et al. Breakdown characteristics of self-triggered switches under different voltage rise-time[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48(4): 1590-1596 doi: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20210393 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 703
- HTML全文浏览量: 234
- PDF下载量: 111
- 被引次数: 0
