高空电磁脉冲作用下电力系统主要效应模式分析

陈宇浩; 谢彦召; 刘民周; 高冲; 李萌; 巩少岩; 周建辉

doi:10.11884/HPLPB201931.190184

高空电磁脉冲作用下电力系统主要效应模式分析

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190184

1.
西安交通大学电力设备电气绝缘国家重点实验室, 西安 710049
2.
全球能源互联网研究院有限公司, 北京 102200
3.
国网江苏省电气有限公司信息通信分公司, 南京 210024

基金项目:

国家电网公司合作项目 SGRIZLKJ (2016) 699号

详细信息

作者简介:
陈宇浩(1993—), 男，博士研究生，从事电磁脉冲效应研究; chenyuhao@stu.xjtu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
谢彦召(1973—), 男，博士，从事电磁脉冲研究; yzxie@xjtu.edu.cn

中图分类号: TM15
计量
- 文章访问数: 1874
- HTML全文浏览量: 649
- PDF下载量: 157
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-05-24
- 修回日期: 2019-06-15
- 刊出日期: 2019-07-15

Analysis of high-altitude electromagnetic effect models on power system

1.
State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
2.
Global Energy Interconnection Research Institute Co Ltd, Beijing 102200, China
3.
Information & Telecommunication Branch of State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Company, Nanjing 210024, China

摘要

摘要: 随着电网智能化和整体规模的提高，现代电力系统越来越容易受到高空电磁脉冲的威胁，一旦关键环节故障将有可能导致连锁反应，造成大面积停电。而针对不同的电力设备，其效应模式和威胁等级也有所不同，需要进行分类和分级研究。根据电力设备在电磁脉冲作用下的不同效应模式，将其分为SCADA系统与继电保护设备，变压器、互感器等线圈类设备，线路与设备避雷器与其他设备，并分析了其效应机理。然后考虑高空电磁脉冲威胁下电力设备存在多种效应等级，介绍了不同效应分类方法以及多等级效应评估模型。最后综合考虑易损性和重要性以及系统间的级联影响，分别梳理总结了在E1和E3作用下电力系统的故障链模式。
- 电力设备 /
- 高空电磁脉冲 /
- 效应模式 /
- 多等级分类
Abstract: With the improvement of the intellectualization and overall scale of power grid, modern power system is more and more vulnerable to the threat of high-altitude electromagnetic pulse. Once the key link fails, cascading reactions may occur, resulting in large-scale blackouts. For different electric equipments, their effect modes and threat levels are also different, thus it is necessary to carry out classification research. According to the different effect modes of electric equipments under electromagnetic pulse, this paper divides the equipments into Supervisor Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system and relay protection equipment, coil type equipment including transformer and so on, lightning arrestor including line type and equipment type, and other types of equipment. Their effect mechanisms are analyzed in detail. Secondly, considering that there are many kinds of effect levels under the threat of high-altitude electromagnetic pulse, different effect classification methods and multi-level effect evaluation model are introduced. Finally, considering comprehensive impact of vulnerability and importance and the cascading effects among equipment, the fail are links of power system under E1 and E3 are summarized and analyzed, respectively.
- electric equipment /
- electromagnetic pulse /
- effect model /
- multistate classification

HTML全文

图 1 综合电磁易损性和关键性的电力设备风险趋势示意图

Figure 1. Sketch of electric equipment assessment combining vulnerability and criticality

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 E1对电力系统威胁故障链示意图

Figure 2. Failure chain sketch of E1 on power system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 E3对电力系统威胁故障链示意图

Figure 3. Failure chain sketch of E3 on power system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(19)

[1]	Nitsch D, Camp M, Sabath F, et al. Susceptibility of some electronic equipment to HPEM threats[J]. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat, 2004, 46(3): 380-389. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2004.831842
[2]	Camp M, Gerth H, Garbe H, et al. Predicting the breakdown behavior of microcontrollers under EMP/UWB impact using a statistical analysis[J]. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat, 2004, 46(3): 368-379. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2004.831816
[3]	Mänsson D, Thottappillil R, Nilsson T, et al. Susceptibility of civilian GPS receivers to electromagnetic radiation[J]. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat, 2008, 50(2): 434-437. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2008.921015
[4]	Parfenov Y V, Zdoukhov L N, Shurupov A V, et al. Research of flashover of power line insulators due to high-voltage pulses with power ON and power OFF[J]. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat, 2013, 55(3): 467-474. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2012.2236094
[5]	Foster J S, Gjelde E, Graham W R, et al. Report of the commission to assess the threat to the United States from electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack: Critical national infrastructures[R]. 2008.
[6]	韩军, 谢彦召, 翟爱斌, 等. 静态随机存储器的电磁脉冲效应实验研究[J]. 核电子学与探测技术, 2010, 30(11): 1423-1423. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HERE201011003.htm Han Jun, Xie Yanzhao, Zhai Aibin, et al. Experimental investigation on EMP effect of SRAM. Nuclear Electronics and Detection Technology, 2010, 30(11): 1423-1423 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HERE201011003.htm
[7]	邓建红, 周启明, 赵刚, 等. 近地面1553B通信系统HEMP效应试验[J]. 信息与电子工程, 2010, 8(3): 318-323. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXYD201003018.htm Deng Jianhong, Zhou Qiming, Zhao Gang, et al. HEMP effect experiment for surface 1553B communication system. Information and Electronic Engineering, 2010, 8(3): 318-323 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXYD201003018.htm
[8]	高晶, 孙继银, 赵星阳, 等. 电磁脉冲作用下RS232接口受损特性分析[J]. 微电子学与计算机, 2009, 26(4): 252-254. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WXYJ200904070.htm Gao Jing, Sun Jiyin, Zhao Xingyang, et al. Fault analysis of RS232 interface interfered by the electromagnetic pulse. Microelectronics & Computer, 2009, 26(4): 252-254 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WXYJ200904070.htm
[9]	马运普, 陈子铭, 高成. 在HEMP感应过电压作用下10 kV避雷器响应特性的研究[J]. 工程兵工程学院学报, 1996, 11(3): 6-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCPQ201803016.htm Ma Yunpu, Chen Ziming, Gao Cheng. Study of the 10kV lightning arresters response under the HEMP induced overvoltage. Journal of Nanjing Engineering Institute, 1996, 11(3): 6-10 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCPQ201803016.htm
[10]	Berge J, Varma R K, Marti L. Laboratory validation of the relationship between geomagnetically induced current (GIC) and transformer absorbed reactive power[C]//Electrical Power and Energy Conference. 2011: 491-495.
[11]	Takasu N, Oshi T, Miyawaki F, et al. An experimental analysis of DC excitation of transformers by geomagnetically induced currents[J]. IEEE Trans Power Delivery, 1994, 9(4): 1173-1182.
[12]	张冰, 刘连光, 肖湘宁. 地磁感应电流对变压器振动、噪声的影响[J]. 高电压技术, 2009(4): 900-904. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDYJ200904034.htm Zhang Bing, Liu Lianguang, Xiao Xiangning. Effects of geomagnetically induced current on the vibration and noise of transformers. High Voltage Engineering, 2009(4): 900-904 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDYJ200904034.htm
[13]	Girgis R, Vedante K. Effects of GIC on power transformers and power systems[C]//2012 IEEE Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition. 2012: 1-8.
[14]	Foster J S, Gjelde E, Graham W R, et al. Report of the commission to assess the threat to the United States from electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack. Volume 1: Executive report[R]. 2004.
[15]	王葵, 孙莹. 电力系统自动化[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2012. Wang Kui, Sun Ying. Power system automation. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2012
[16]	Florkowski M, Furgal J, Pajak P. Analysis of fast transient voltage distributions in transformer windings under different insulation conditions[J]. IEEE Trans Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 2012, 19(6): 1991-1998. doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2012.6396957
[17]	Sabath F. Classification of electromagnetic effects at system level[C]//Int Sympon Electromagn Compat. 2008.
[18]	LiKejie, Xie Yanzhao, Chen Yuhao, et al. Multinomial regression model for the evaluation of multi-level effects caused by high-power electromagnetic environments[J]. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat, 2019, 61(1): 149-156.
[19]	LiuYu, Han Feng, Wang Jianguo, et al. Vulnerability assessment of a multistate component for IEMI based on a Bayesian method[J]. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat, 2019, 61(2): 467-475.