Study on mechanism of effect of different experimental conditions on laser-induced plasma
-
摘要: 常温常压下,采用波长532 nm的Nd:YAG纳秒激光器激发诱导空气中的铝合金,由高分辨率的光谱仪和ICCD对等离子体发射光谱采集和实现光电转换。研究激光能量、ICCD门延迟和聚焦透镜到样品表面的距离(lens-to-sample distance,LTSD)对谱线信号强度和等离子体电子温度的影响,并分析了产生影响的物理机制。结果表明,固定ICCD门延迟和LTSD,随着激光能量的增大,谱线强度和电子温度均增大;计算结果表明,当激光能量从20 mJ增加到160 mJ时,原子谱线Al I 396.15 nm,Mg I 518.36 nm,离子谱线Mg II 279.54 nm谱线强度相较于20 mJ分别提高了12.83,6.45,10.56倍。固定激光能量和LTSD,ICCD门延迟在100~4 000 ns范围内变化时,随着延迟的增加,谱线强度和等离子体电子温度均呈指数形式衰减。固定ICCD门延迟和激光能量,采用焦距为75 mm的聚焦透镜,研究了LTSD对等离子体参数的影响机理。结果表明,聚焦透镜到样品的距离对等离子体的谱线强度和电子温度有较大的影响。等离子体的特征谱线强度和等离子体的电子温度的变化规律基本一致,分别在聚焦透镜到样品表面的距离为73 mm和79 mm处取得峰值,并在73 mm处对应最大值。Abstract: Under normal pressure and temperature, aluminum alloy in air can be excited by Nd:YAG nanosecond laser with wavelength 532 nm, the collection and photoelectric conversion of the plasma emission spectrum are executed by a high-resolution spectrometer and an ICCD. This paper studies the influences of laser energy, ICCD gate delay and lens-to-sample distance (LTSD) on the spectral intensity and plasma electron temperature as well as the physical mechanism. It is demonstrated that the spectral intensity and electron temperature increase with the increase of laser energy at the fixed ICCD gate delay and LTSD. The calculated results show that when the laser energy increases from 20 mJ to 160 mJ, the line intensities of the atomic spectral lines Al I 396.15 nm, Mg I 518.36 nm, and the Mg II 279.54 nm ion spectral line are 12.83, 6.45 and 10.56 times higher than that of 20 mJ, respectively. At the fixed laser energy and LTSD, when the ICCD gate delay changes within 100−4 000 ns, the spectral intensity and plasma electron temperature decay exponential with the increase of ICCD gate delay. With the same ICCD gate delay and laser energy, the influence mechanism of LTSD on plasma parameters was studied by using a focusing lens with focal length of 75 mm. It is demonstrated that the lens-to-sample distance has a considerable impact on the spectral intensity and plasma electron temperature. The results indicate that the change of the spectral intensity is consistent with that of the plasma electron temperature. The curves have two peaks at the distances of 73 mm and 79 mm from sample surface, and the values reach their maximum at 73 mm.
-
表 1 用来计算等离子体电子温度的Al原子谱线参数
Table 1. Spectroscopic parameters of Al I atomic lines used for calculating the plasma electron temperature
wavelength/nm upper level energy/cm−1 g A/(108 s−1) 308.22 32 435 4 0.622 309.27 32 436 6 0.783 394.40 25 347 2 0.498 396.15 25 347 2 0.982 -
[1] 林京君. 钢铁成分的激光诱导击穿光谱高精度检测方法与装备[D].长春: 长春工业大学, 2018.Lin Jingjun. High precision detection method and equipment for steel composition with laser induced breakdown spectroscopy[D]. Changchun: Changchun University of Technology, 2018: 8-10 [2] 王静鸽, 陈兴龙, 付洪波, 等. 透镜到样品的距离对激光诱导等离子体的影响[J]. 光学学报, 2014, 34(9):326-333. (Wang Jingge, Chen Xinglong,Fu Hongbo, et al. Influence of the lens-to-sample distance on laser-induced plasma[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2014, 34(9): 326-333 [3] 林晓梅, 钟磊, 林京君. 样品温度对双脉冲激光诱导Al等离子体特征参数的影响[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2018, 55(2):269-276. (Lin Xiaomei, Zhong Lei, Lin Jingjun. Effect of sample temperature on the character parameters of double pulse laser induced Al plasma[J]. Advances in Laser and Optoelectronics, 2018, 55(2): 269-276 [4] 李占锋, 王芮雯, 邓琥, 等. 黄连、附片和茯苓内铜元素激光诱导击穿光谱分析[J]. 发光学报, 2016, 37(1):100-105. (Li Zhanfeng, Wang Ruiwen, Deng Hu, et al. Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy of Cu in coptis chinensis, aconite root and poria cocos[J]. Chinese Journal of Luminescence, 2016, 37(1): 100-105 doi: 10.3788/fgxb20163701.0100 [5] Singh P, Mal E, Khare A, et al. A study of archaeological pottery of Northeast India using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)[J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2018, 33: 71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2018.03.011 [6] Lazic V, Vadrycci M, Fantoni R, ea al. Applications of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for cultural heritage: A comparison with X-ray fluorescence and particle induced X-ray emission techniques[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2018, 149: 1-41. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2018.07.012 [7] 姚红兵, 杨风潇, 袁冬青, 等. 激光诱导Ti等离子体电子温度的实验研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2017, 37(12):3851-3854. (Yao Hongbing, Yang Fengxiao, Yuan Dongqing, et al. Experimental investigation on the electron temperature of laser-induced Ti plasmas[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2017, 37(12): 3851-3854 [8] 付杰, 郭喜庆, 赵天卓, 等. 激光诱导钢靶等离子体时间分辨光谱特性研究[J]. 中国激光, 2017, 44(3):269-275. (Fu Jie, Guo Xiqing, Zhao Tianzhuo, et al. Spectral time evolution behavior of laser induced steel target plasma[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2017, 44(3): 269-275 [9] 杨雪, 李苏宇, 姜远飞, 等. 不同样品温度下聚焦透镜到样品表面距离对激光诱导铜击穿光谱的影响[J]. 物理学报, 2019, 68(6):174-182. (Yang Xue, Li Suyu, Jiang Yuanfei, et al. Influence of distance between focusing lens and sample surface on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of brass at different sample temperatures[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(6): 174-182 [10] Yu Jin, Ma Qianli, Vincent M, et al. Generation and expansion of laser-induced plasma as a spectroscopic emission source[J]. Front Phys, 2012, 7(6): 649-669. doi: 10.1007/s11467-012-0251-2 [11] Nation Institute of Standards and Technology. Atomic spectra database[DB/OL]. https://www.nist.gov/pml/atomic-spectra-database. [12] 章玉珠, 王广安, 朱金荣, 等. 离焦量对等离子体冲击波力学效应的影响[J]. 中国激光, 2007, 34(3):318-322. (Zhang Yuzhu, Wang Guang'an, Zhu Jinrong, et al. Influence of defocusing distance on mechanical effect of plasma shock wave induced by laser[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2007, 34(3): 318-322 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-7025.2007.03.003 [13] 刘月华, 陈明, 刘向东, 等. 透镜到靶材的距离对脉冲激光诱导等离子体的影响机理研究[J]. 物理学报, 2013, 62(2):444-450. (Liu Yuehua, Chen Ming, Liu Xiangdong, et al. The mechanism of effect of lens-to-sample distance on laser-induced plasma[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(2): 444-450