留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

一种基于吸气电极的新型真空触发开关

卢彪 彭太平 言杰 邱瑞 柯建林 龙天骏

卢彪, 彭太平, 言杰, 等. 一种基于吸气电极的新型真空触发开关[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2021, 33: 055003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210014
引用本文: 卢彪, 彭太平, 言杰, 等. 一种基于吸气电极的新型真空触发开关[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2021, 33: 055003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210014
Lu Biao, Peng Taiping, Yan Jie, et al. New type of triggered vacuum switch based on gas-breathing electrode[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 055003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210014
Citation: Lu Biao, Peng Taiping, Yan Jie, et al. New type of triggered vacuum switch based on gas-breathing electrode[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 055003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210014

一种基于吸气电极的新型真空触发开关

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210014
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(11575162)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    卢 彪(1988—),男,助理研究员,主要从事脉冲功率技术研究

  • 中图分类号: TM564

New type of triggered vacuum switch based on gas-breathing electrode

  • 摘要: 针对真空触发开关触发时延和抖动大、使用寿命不长的难题,设计了一种基于吸气电极的新型真空触发开关,开展工作寿命测试实验和不同触发极性、主间隙电压和触发能量下的导通特性实验。实验结果表明:与纯金属电极开关相比,吸气电极开关的触发时延和抖动更小,工作寿命更长。负极性触发时的触发时延和抖动均远低于正极性触发。正极性触发的触发时延为1.7~3 μs,抖动为300~700 ns,而负极性触发的触发时延为400~600 ns,抖动为30~70 ns。触发时延和抖动都随着触发能量的增大而减小,但当能量高于一定值后,触发能量对导通特性的影响趋于饱和。
  • 图  1  吸气电极真空触发开关结构示意图

    Figure  1.  Structure of gas-breathing triggered vacuum switch

    图  2  吸气电极真空触发开关样品

    Figure  2.  Sample of gas-breathing triggered vacuum switch

    图  3  触发极与阴极表面结构

    Figure  3.  Structure of trigger electrode and cathode surface

    图  4  主电路

    Figure  4.  Main circuit

    图  5  触发电路

    Figure  5.  Trigger circuit

    图  6  典型触发电压、主间隙电压和主间隙电流波形图

    Figure  6.  Typical waveform of trigger voltage and main gap voltage

    图  7  触发时延示意图

    Figure  7.  Diagram of trigger delay

    图  8  极性模式示意图

    Figure  8.  Diagram of polarity modes

    图  9  触发极性对触发时延及抖动的影响

    Figure  9.  Influence of trigger polarity on trigger delay and jitter

    图  10  触发能量对触发时延及抖动的影响

    Figure  10.  Influence of trigger energy (increase with trigger voltage increase) on trigger delay and jitter

    图  11  吸气触发极与纯金属触发极对比图

    Figure  11.  Comparison diagram of gas-breathing trigger electrode and metal trigger electrode

    图  12  吸气电极开关和金属电极开关的电极烧蚀对比图

    Figure  12.  Comparison of electrode ablation between gas-breathing electrode switch and metal electrode switch

    表  1  吸气触发极开关统计结果

    Table  1.   Statistical results of gas-breathing trigger electrode switch

    No.average trigger breakdown voltage/kVaverage trigger delay/nssuccess rate of conduction/%
    0~503.85390100
    51~1003.54453100
    101~1503.61385100
    151−2003.27480100
    201~2503.31430100
    251~3003.2249898
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  金属触发极开关统计结果

    Table  2.   Statistical results of metal trigger electrode switch

    No.average trigger breakdown voltage/kVaverage trigger delay/nssuccess rate of conduction/%
    0~50 4.02 1850 100
    51~100 3.21 2270 94
    101−150 2.65 2460 80
    151~200 2.13 2750 68
    201~250 1.67 3100 44
    251~300 1.32 3460 24
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 何俊佳, 邹积岩, 王海, 等. 高性能大功率触发真空开关的研究[J]. 电工电能新技术, 1997, 16(2):28-32. (He Junjia, Zou Jiyan, Wang Hai, et al. Review of development in high quality, high power triggered vacuum switches[J]. Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy, 1997, 16(2): 28-32
    [2] 廖敏夫, 邹积岩, 段雄英, 等. 高性能真空触发开关技术的研究综述[J]. 高压电器, 2006, 42(1):51-54. (Liao Minfu, Zou Jiyan, Duan Xiongying, et al. Overview on techniques of high-performance triggered vacuum switch[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2006, 42(1): 51-54 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1609.2006.01.016
    [3] Lafferty J M. Triggered vacuum gaps[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1966, 54(1): 23-32. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1966.4570
    [4] Kamakshaiah S, Rau R S N. Delay characteristics of a simple triggered vacuum gap[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 1975, 8(12): 1426-1495. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/8/12/014
    [5] Raju G R G, Hackam R, Benson F A. Breakdown mechanisms and electrical properties of triggered vacuum gaps[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1976, 47(4): 1310-1317. doi: 10.1063/1.322832
    [6] 吴汉基, 安世明, 冯学章, 等. 触发真空开关的触发寿命[J]. 高压电器, 1987, 29(6):37-43. (Wu Hanji, An Shiming, Feng Xuezhang, et al. The triggered lifetime of triggered vacuum switches[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 1987, 29(6): 37-43
    [7] 夏胜国, 董曼玲, 何俊佳, 等. 场击穿式TVS时延特性的测量与分析[J]. 高电压技术, 2007, 33(9):167-170, 178. (Xia Shengguo, Dong Manling, He Junjia, et al. Measurement and analysis of time delay characteristics of a field-breakdown triggered vacuum switches[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2007, 33(9): 167-170, 178 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6520.2007.09.037
    [8] 胡国威, 夏长征, 陈仕修, 等. 真空触发开关导通瞬间高频脉冲电压的测量[J]. 高压电器, 2004, 40(5):364-365, 369. (Hu Guowei, Xia Changzheng, Chen Shixiu, et al. Measurement of the high frequency pulse when the triggered vacuum switch turns on[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2004, 40(5): 364-365, 369 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1609.2004.05.015
    [9] 邹积岩, 段雄英, 扈志宏. 真空触发开关通断特性实验研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2000, 40(S1):20-23. (Zou Jiyan, Duan Xiongying, Hu Zhihong. Experimental investigations on operation capacity of triggered vacuum switches[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2000, 40(S1): 20-23
    [10] 盖斐, 陈仕修, 陈堃, 等. 长间隙真空触发开关导通特性[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2012, 24(4):847-850. (Gai Fei, Chen Shixiu, Chen Kun, et al. Conduction characteristics of long-gap triggered vacuum switch[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(4): 847-850 doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122404.0847
    [11] 王延召, 戴玲, 周正阳, 等. 多棒极型触发真空开关极性效应[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2012, 24(3):587-591. (Wang Yanzhao, Dai Ling, Zhou Zhengyang, et al. Polarity effect on triggered vacuum switch with multi-rod system[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(3): 587-591 doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122403.0587
    [12] 张亚丽, 冯卫刚. 真空触发开关的触发极结构研究[J]. 真空电子技术, 2017(1):73-75. (Zhang Yali, Feng Weigang. Research on trigger electrode structures of triggered vacuum switches[J]. Vacuum Electronics, 2017(1): 73-75
    [13] 魏荣华, 吴汉荃, 史长龙, 等. 触发真空开关[J]. 高压电器, 1983, 25(6):50-56. (Wei Ronghua, Wu Hanquan, Shi Changlong, et al. Triggered vacuum switch[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 1983, 25(6): 50-56
    [14] Vozdvijensky V A, Sidorov V A. Initial stage of discharge current growth in a triggered vacuum gap[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 1991, 19(5): 778-781. doi: 10.1109/27.108414
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  940
  • HTML全文浏览量:  295
  • PDF下载量:  42
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-01-14
  • 修回日期:  2021-05-06
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-05-17
  • 刊出日期:  2021-05-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回