Quantification characterization technology of electromagnetic compatibility based on test results
-
摘要: 以装备电磁兼容性量化需求出发,根据电磁兼容试验数据的特点,将试验结果分为EMI类和EMS两种类型进行分析,提出了EMI和EMS两类试验结果量化表征方法并构建了数学模型。针对EMI类试验数据特点,通过超标数据占比和超标特征两个维度完成了EMI数据的量化表征模型构建;针对EMS类试验结果仅为定性描述这一特点,结合试验过程中的敏感现象,从干扰源及敏感频段两个维度进行量化表征模型构建,通过软件实现了相关量化模型,并通过试验结果量化算例予以验证。以试验结果开展的量化表征研究工作,获得了试验项目的数学量化模型,实现了基于国军标试验标准的电磁兼容试验结果量化表征。Abstract: Based on the quantitative requirements of equipment electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), the test results can be divided into EMI type and EMS type according to the characteristics of EMC test data. Thus the quantitative representation methods of EMI and EMS test results are put forward and the mathematical model is established in this paper. By analyzing the characteristics of EMI test data, the corresponding quantization representation model is constructed through the two dimensions of standard data share and excessive features. According to the characteristics that EMS test results are only qualitative description and combined with the sensitive phenomena in the measurement process, a quantitative characterization model is constructed from two dimensions of interference source and sensitive frequency band. Besides, the relevant quantitative model is realized by software and verified by experimental measurement. In this paper, the quantitative research of the test results is carried out and the mathematical quantification model of the corresponding test items is obtained, and the quantitative characterization of the EMC qualitative test results based on the national military standard is achieved. The relevant research results of this paper have certain reference significance in system-level EMC performance quantitative evaluation, big data analysis of test results and optimization design of equipment EMC.
-
表 1 敏感度扫描参数
Table 1. Sensitivity scanning parameters
frequency scan rate scanning step 25 Hz~1 MHz 0.0333$ {f}_{\rm{{0}}}/s $ 0.05$ {f}_{\rm{{0}}} $ 1 MHz~30 MHz 0.00667$ {f}_{\rm{{0}}}/s $ 0.01$ {f}_{\rm{{0}}} $ 30 MHz~1 GHz 0.00333$ {f}_{\rm{{0}}}/s $ 0.005$ {f}_{\rm{{0}}} $ 1 GHz~40 GHz 0.00167$ {f}_{\rm{{0}}}/s $ 0.0025$ {f}_{\rm{{0}}} $ 表 2 敏感度现象量化值
Table 2. Sensitivity phenomenon quantization values
interference
noiseclick and
popindicator light
abnormalpicture
flutteraudio
distortionimage
shiftaudio
failurepower
downcolour
distortionaudio
unintelligibleaudio
disappear amceshow black
screenshort
circuit0.95 0.89 0.86 0.71 0.67 0.56 0.51 0.45 0.33 0.27 0.15 0.13 0.12 -
[1] 苏东林, 雷军, 刘焱, 等. 一种大型复杂电子信息系统电磁兼容顶层量化设计新方法[J]. 遥测遥控, 2008, 29(4):1-8. (Su Donglin, Lei Jun, Liu Yan, et al. A novel method of top-level EMC design technology for large and complex electronic information systems[J]. Journal of Telemetry, Tracking and Command, 2008, 29(4): 1-8 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1000.2008.04.001 [2] 田锦. 通信系统电磁兼容指标构建与综合评估技术研究[D]. 西安电子科技大学, 2013.Tian Jin. Research on the EMC index construction and synthetic evaluation for communication system[D]. Xi’an: Xidian University, 2013 [3] 阙渭焰, 孙永全, 梁景修, 等. 武器装备全寿命复杂电磁环境试验与评估方法[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2014, 26:073202. (Que Weiyan, Sun Yongquan, Liang Jingxiu, et al. Military system E3 test and evaluation during acquisition life cycle[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26: 073202 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.073202 [4] 沈飞, 李禄, 许雄. 战场电磁环境中有源干扰定量表征研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2018, 30:013208. (Shen Fei, Li Lu, Xu Xiong, et al. Quantitative analysis of active jamming in battlefield electromagnetic environment[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 013208 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170267 [5] 张学宇, 苏东林, 戴飞, 等. 飞行器外部电磁环境分析与辐射安全裕度试验方法研究[J]. 遥测遥控, 2010(2):7-11. (Zhang Xueyu, Su Donglin, Dai Fei, et al. Analysis of the EME of the airplane and study of the radiation satety margin test[J]. Journal of Telemetry, Tracking and Command, 2010(2): 7-11 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1000.2010.02.002 [6] 董宁, 谢彦召. 考虑参数不确定性的高空电磁脉冲E1分量环境计算及分析[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2019, 31:070002. (Dong Ning, Xie Yanzhao. Early-time high-altitude electromagnetic pulse simulation and analysis considering parameter uncertainty[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31: 070002 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190140 [7] Klotz F, Roebl M, Koerber B, et al. New standardized EMC evaluation methods for communication transceivers[J]. IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications, 2019, 1(1): 14-19. doi: 10.1109/LEMCPA.2019.2912588 [8] 严义君, 杨显清. 集群电子设备电磁兼容性评估方法[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2001, 30(3):245-249. (Yan Yijun, Yang Xianqing. Methods of evaluating electromagnetic compatibility of cluster electronic equipments[J]. Journal of UEST of China, 2001, 30(3): 245-249 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0548.2001.03.005 [9] Yalcin E, Girard C. Modeling interference phenomena between cosite radio communication equipments to evaluate systems performance degradation[J]. IEEE, 2009, 1(1): 249-254. [10] 达拉基米尔. 莫达齐. 系统级电磁兼容分析的离散技术及应用综述[J]. 宇航计测技术, 2007(z1):39-45. (Vladimir Mordachev Eugene Sinkevich. Discrete technology of electromagnetic compatibility analysis at the system level and application overview[J]. Journal of Astronautic Metrology and Measurement, 2007(z1): 39-45 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7202.2007.z1.007 [11] 戎建刚, 黄和国, 王鑫, 等. 威胁电磁环境的定量描述方法[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2013, 29(4):18-21. (Rong Jiangang, Huang Heguo, Wang Xin, et al. Study on quantitative description of threaten electromagnetic environment[J]. Aerospace Electronic Warfare, 2013, 29(4): 18-21 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2421.2013.04.006 [12] 谢彦召, 相辉, 翟爱斌, 等. 电磁脉冲效应研究中的范数分析方法及应用[J]. 核电子学与探测技术, 2010, 30(10):1278-1293. (Xie Yanzhao, Xiang Hui, Zhai Aibin, et al. Applications of various norms in the field of EMP effects[J]. Nuclear Electronics and Detection Technology, 2010, 30(10): 1278-1293 -