Zhang Haoran, Zeng Qin, Chen Chong, et al. Testing and analysis of coupled program of MCNP and FISPACT[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29: 036025. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160424
Citation: Wang Yiyuan, Shen Zongyue, Zhao Zhiming, et al. Transient ionizing radiation effects of electrocircuit system[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28: 044001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.124001

Transient ionizing radiation effects of electrocircuit system

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.124001
  • Received Date: 2015-10-30
  • Rev Recd Date: 2015-12-25
  • Publish Date: 2016-04-15
  • When the devices are irradiated with the system at the transient dose rate, many of them will work at the state that all of the input signal, power supply and the photocurrent are out of the designed state. This transient effects can not be found by irradiating the device only. So transient radiation effects with -ray on an electronics system, composed of DC/DC, CPU, FPGA, et al, were investigated. The gamma pulse width was 20 ns and the dose rate was in the range of 2.8105 to 1.7107 Gy (Si)/s in the experimental study. And the function of the system and many parameters of the main devices were tested. The result of experiments showed that some of the test devices were disrupted by low level of transient radiation, but the system work was not disturbed. While the dose rates increased, all of the devices were disrupted and the system function failed. The signal originating from the transient ionizing radiation transferring from the input to the output of the device was observed.
  • Relative Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.2 %FULLTEXT: 14.2 %META: 78.8 %META: 78.8 %PDF: 7.0 %PDF: 7.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.8 %其他: 5.8 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %上海: 1.2 %上海: 1.2 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丹东: 0.1 %丹东: 0.1 %伊斯兰堡: 0.4 %伊斯兰堡: 0.4 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %北京: 2.9 %北京: 2.9 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %台州: 1.6 %台州: 1.6 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %哈密: 0.1 %哈密: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔科夫: 1.5 %哈尔科夫: 1.5 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %大连: 0.6 %大连: 0.6 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %安德森: 0.4 %安德森: 0.4 %宜昌: 0.4 %宜昌: 0.4 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %张家口: 1.7 %张家口: 1.7 %张家界: 0.1 %张家界: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %惠州: 0.1 %惠州: 0.1 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %拉帕汉诺克县: 0.1 %拉帕汉诺克县: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.4 %新加坡: 0.4 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %普赖恩维尔: 0.1 %普赖恩维尔: 0.1 %杭州: 1.0 %杭州: 1.0 %梧州: 0.1 %梧州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %沃思堡: 0.9 %沃思堡: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %淄博: 1.7 %淄博: 1.7 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %班加罗尔: 0.1 %班加罗尔: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.4 %绵阳: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 42.2 %芒廷维尤: 42.2 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.1 %荆州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 13.2 %西宁: 13.2 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %诺沃克: 4.1 %诺沃克: 4.1 %贵阳: 1.0 %贵阳: 1.0 %运城: 1.6 %运城: 1.6 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %长沙: 1.6 %长沙: 1.6 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %其他其他ChinaUnited States上海东莞临汾丹东伊斯兰堡保定北京南京南通台州合肥周口哈密哈尔滨哈尔科夫嘉兴大连天津娄底安德森宜昌常州常德广州廊坊张家口张家界徐州德阳惠州成都拉帕汉诺克县新加坡昆明晋城普赖恩维尔杭州梧州武汉沃思堡沈阳洛阳济南淄博深圳温州湖州漯河烟台班加罗尔石家庄秦皇岛绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州衢州西宁西安诺沃克贵阳运城遵义郑州重庆长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (1104) PDF downloads(190) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return