Volume 29 Issue 01
Dec.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Wang Yangyang, Cao Xinrong. Application of best estimate plus uncertainty analysis method for CNP600 rod ejection accident[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29: 016011. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160238
Citation: Wang Yangyang, Cao Xinrong. Application of best estimate plus uncertainty analysis method for CNP600 rod ejection accident[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29: 016011. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160238

Application of best estimate plus uncertainty analysis method for CNP600 rod ejection accident

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160238
  • Received Date: 2016-06-16
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-09-26
  • Publish Date: 2017-01-14
  • Compared with conservative accident analysis method, best estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) accident analysis method can gain realistic analysis results and safety margins, and improve the nuclear power plant economy and flexibility of operation with the reasonable security assurance. The rod ejection accident (REA) analysis models under the condition of hot full power (HFP) and hot zero power (HZP) were established by using the best estimate code RELAP5-3D according to the design features of CNP600. The dominant phenomena and processes were identified through REA phenomena identification and ranking table (PIRT), and the important input parameters which have significant impacts on the key safety parameters were selected. The DAKOTA code was used to generate the samples of the important uncertainty input parameters by taking the Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) approach and the one sided tolerance upper limits of the key safety parameters were calculated through non-parametric method. In both cases the results obtained show that the maximum average fuel pellet enthalpy, peak fuel pellet temperature, peak cladding temperature, peak system pressure during accident transient meet the REA acceptance criteria. In both cases the one sided tolerance upper limits of peak nuclear power obtained by the non-parametric method are reasonable, and the one sided tolerance upper limits of maximum average fuel enthalpy obtained have considerable safety margins compared with the traditional REA conservative analysis values.
  • loading
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (1332) PDF downloads(347) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return