Zhou Liang, Zhang Ming, Zhao Zheng, et al. Research of positive and negative polarity pseudo-spark switches[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36: 115010. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.240313
Citation: Zheng Ying, Zhang Bin, Zhang Shun, et al. Preliminary verification of the high-efficiency even-parity discrete ordinates method[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29: 056010. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160274

Preliminary verification of the high-efficiency even-parity discrete ordinates method

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160274
  • Received Date: 2016-06-16
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-12-29
  • Publish Date: 2017-05-15
  • The accuracy and efficiency of core physics calculation have a great impact on the safety of nuclear reactors. As reactor cores get more and more complex, diffusion theory presents low accuracy. Various transport methods are developed and studied. The even-parity discrete ordinates method(EPSN) needs less storage and less computing time due to a reduction in angular domain of one-half compared to the first-order transport equations. The new high-efficiency even-parity discrete ordinates(HEPSN) method is proposed based on optimizing the EPSN method. It is worth noting that HEPSN method only solves one-eighth of the angular domain. HEPSN method appears to have no negative flux, be easy to obtain consistent diffusion synthetic acceleration and have uncoupled reflective boundary conditions. The accuracy of HEPSN method for critical calculation is verified by TAKEDA benchmarks. The results show that the accuracy of HEPSN method is higher than diffusion theory and the computing time and the computer memory are less than EPSN method. HEPSN method has the potential to be applied to the calculations of large reactor cores.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Peng Ning, Yang Yong, Zhang Ming, Rao Bo, Zhang Zhengqing. Research on electromagnetic crosstalk in double differential mode unshielded cable loop[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36(2): 025017. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.230228
    [2]Jiao Guangwei, Tian Shunqiang, Zhang Wenzhi, Wu Xu, Sun Bo, Jin Lin, Zhao Shenjie, Xu Junjie. Influence and analysis of power grid fluctuation on the operation of shanghai synchrotron radiation facility[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(8): 084004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210553
    [3]Zhang Ning, Lai Longwei, Yuan Renxian, Yu Luyang. Multi-bunch instability diagnostics via transverse feedback system in Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(4): 044003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.200212
    [4]Yang Yong, Leng Yongbin, Yan Yingbing. Beam signal stretching processing based on microstrip transmission line[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(09): 095103. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.151286
    [5]Geng Helong, Leng Yongbin, Zhou Weimin, Lai Longwei, Yan Yinbing. FPGA-based storage ring beam orbit interlock system design[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(12): 125102. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.125102
    [6]Shi Min, Yang Junyi, Li Zhongguo, Nie Zhongquan, Song Yinglin. High-sensitivity measurement of surface optical nonlinearities[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(03): 583-586. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132503.0583
    [7]Jiang Bocheng, Zhang Manzhou, Li Haohu, Zhao Zhentang. Top-up safety simulation of injection beam for Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility storage ring[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(04): 985-988.
    [8]Yan Yingbing, Leng Yongbin, Lai Longwei, Zhang Ning, Yi Xing, Yang Guisen. Beam lifetime measurement using beam position monitor in SSRF[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(01): 189-192.
    [9]chen jie, ye kairong, leng yongbin. Development of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility synchrotron radiation interferometer[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(01): 0- .
    [10]tan moyan, zhu jingtao, wang zhanshan. Design of reflective multilayer polarizers in extreme ultraviolet range using different merit functions[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(04): 0- .
    [11]leng yongbin, yan yingbing, zhou weimin, yuan renxian. Precise beam current measurement for storage ring using beam position monitor[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(12): 0- .
    [12]tang siwei, yin chongxian, liu dekang. Orbit noise analysis in Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility storage ring[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(07): 0- .
    [13]luo qing, sun baogen, he duohui, lu ping, wang xiaohui, fang jia. Beam position monitor with racetrack cavity[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(07): 0- .
    [14]leng yongbin, yan yingbing, yuan renxian, zhou weimin. Betatron tune measurement system for Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility storage ring[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(10): 0- .
    [15]wu ying, chen jianping, ni xiaowu, chu ran. Experimental study of frequency shift of reflected microwave from laser-induced plasma[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2009, 21(06): 0- .
    [16]ke ming, yu chenghao. Application of articulated arm to components’ fiducialization in Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2009, 21(12): 0- .
    [17]yang chun-ping, wu jian, leng jie. Parameterized model of solar radiation reflection by the ground[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2007, 19(02): 0- .
    [18]yu cheng-hao, yin li-xin, du han-wen, zhao zhen-tang, huang kai-xi. Survey and alignment design of Shanghai synchrotron radiation facility[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2006, 18(07): 0- .
    [19]luo yong, li hong-fu, xu yong, deng xue, zhao qing. RF windows of low reflectivity and absorption for high average power gyroklystrons[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2004, 16(11): 0- .
    [20]zhang jun, zhong hui huang. Reflection dependence on frequency of overmoded slow wave structure and the influence of resonant cavity[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2003, 15(08): 0- .
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 杨星,冷用斌,周逸媚. 逐束团三维信息提取软件HOTCAP的实时性能优化. 核技术. 2024(02): 27-34 .
    2. Xing Yang,Hong-Shuang Wang,Yi-Mei Zhou,Yong-Bin Leng. Determining beam transverse absolute position by triangulation of multi-electrode signal phase differences. Nuclear Science and Techniques. 2024(08): 57-66 .
    3. 周逸媚,许兴懿,冷用斌. 电子储存环同步工作点精确测量和应用. 核技术. 2021(09): 19-24 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 30.9 %FULLTEXT: 30.9 %META: 65.9 %META: 65.9 %PDF: 3.1 %PDF: 3.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.8 %其他: 3.8 %其他: 0.7 %其他: 0.7 %Austell: 0.0 %Austell: 0.0 %Canada: 0.2 %Canada: 0.2 %China: 0.5 %China: 0.5 %Colombia: 0.1 %Colombia: 0.1 %Germany: 0.0 %Germany: 0.0 %India: 0.0 %India: 0.0 %Italy: 0.0 %Italy: 0.0 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Korea Republic of: 0.1 %Korea Republic of: 0.1 %Netherlands: 0.1 %Netherlands: 0.1 %Saudi Arabia: 0.0 %Saudi Arabia: 0.0 %Spain: 0.1 %Spain: 0.1 %Taiwan, China: 0.1 %Taiwan, China: 0.1 %United Kingdom: 0.3 %United Kingdom: 0.3 %United States: 1.0 %United States: 1.0 %Wixom: 0.0 %Wixom: 0.0 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %丁克尔舍尔本: 0.1 %丁克尔舍尔本: 0.1 %上海: 4.5 %上海: 4.5 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %中山: 0.0 %中山: 0.0 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丹东: 0.0 %丹东: 0.0 %佛山: 0.0 %佛山: 0.0 %佛罗里达: 0.1 %佛罗里达: 0.1 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 1.6 %兰州: 1.6 %北京: 18.8 %北京: 18.8 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南平: 0.0 %南平: 0.0 %厦门: 0.0 %厦门: 0.0 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %台湾省: 0.5 %台湾省: 0.5 %合肥: 1.0 %合肥: 1.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.0 %圣保罗: 0.0 %圣保罗: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %宁德: 0.1 %宁德: 0.1 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.1 %岳阳: 0.1 %岳阳: 0.1 %常州: 0.0 %常州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %文昌: 0.0 %文昌: 0.0 %新乡: 0.0 %新乡: 0.0 %新竹: 0.1 %新竹: 0.1 %无锡: 0.0 %无锡: 0.0 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %普洱: 0.0 %普洱: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 1.3 %杭州: 1.3 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.0 %泽西: 0.3 %泽西: 0.3 %洛杉矶: 0.3 %洛杉矶: 0.3 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %滁州: 0.2 %滁州: 0.2 %漯河: 0.4 %漯河: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %福州: 0.0 %福州: 0.0 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.0 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %绵阳: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 9.4 %芒廷维尤: 9.4 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %西宁: 45.5 %西宁: 45.5 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %迈尔斯堡: 0.1 %迈尔斯堡: 0.1 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.1 %郑州: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.0 %其他其他AustellCanadaChinaColombiaGermanyIndiaItalyKao-sungKorea Republic ofNetherlandsSaudi ArabiaSpainTaiwan, ChinaUnited KingdomUnited StatesWixom[]丁克尔舍尔本上海东莞中山临汾丹东佛山佛罗里达保定六安兰州北京南京南平厦门台州台湾省合肥呼和浩特哥伦布嘉兴圣保罗大连宁德宣城密蘇里城岳阳常州广州张家口惠州成都扬州文昌新乡新竹无锡昆明晋城普洱朝阳杭州武汉沈阳泽西洛杉矶济南深圳湖州滁州漯河石家庄福州科珀斯克里斯蒂秦皇岛绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州蚌埠衡阳西宁西安贵阳迈尔斯堡运城邯郸郑州重庆长治阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (725) PDF downloads(209) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return