Volume 30 Issue 1
Jan.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  High Power Laser and Particle Beams  > 2018  >  30(1): 013004
Shao Ruoyan, Liu Jianjun, Wu Ruihua, et al. Pulsed xenon lamp power supply[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31: 021001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.180331
Citation: Sun Huifang, Dong Zhiwei, Zhang Fang. Simulation of one-dimensional system generated electromagnetic pulse boundary layer[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 013004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170210
shu

Simulation of one-dimensional system generated electromagnetic pulse boundary layer

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170210

  • Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, P.O.Box 8009, Beijing 100094, China

  • Received Date: 2017-06-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-09-05
  • Publish Date: 2018-01-15
    Abstract
  • The one-dimensional system generated electromagnetic pulse(SGEMP) boundary layer is simulated by PIC code of quasi-first principle. The SGEMP effects of monoenergetic emission model are studied—the photoelectrons are emitted normally at 3.3×1020m-2·s-1 all with 2 keV energy from infinitely large dielectric plane while positive charges are left on the plane. When the steady state is reached, the maximum distance the electrons travel is oscillating between 5.8 cm and 7.5 cm, the charge density at z=0 is oscillating within (6.0-9.0)×10－6C/m3 and electric field at the surface is 50-55kV/m. The build-up time of quasi-steady state is 14.0 ns. The simulation results of steady state accord with the theoretic results, and the simulation results could image the forming process and the adiabatic oscillation of the steady state more clearly than the theoretic results. The modeling by PIC code to study SGEMP effects is validated.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(9)
  • [1]
    王泰春, 贺云汉, 王玉芝. 电磁脉冲导论[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2011.

    Wang Taichun, He Yunhan, Wang Yuzhi. Introduction to electromagnetic pulse. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2011
    [2]
    Wenaas E P, Rogers S. Sensitivity of SGEMP to input parameters[J]. IEEE Trans Nuclear Science, 1975, 22(6): 2362-2367. doi: 10.1109/TNS.1975.4328134
    [3]
    Woods A J, Wennas E P. Scaling laws for SGEMP[J]. IEEE Trans Nuclear Science, 1976, 23(6): 1903-1908. doi: 10.1109/TNS.1976.4328597
    [4]
    Higgins D F, Lee K S H, Marin L. System-generated EMP[J]. IEEE Trans Antennas and Propagation, 1978, 26(1): 14-22. doi: 10.1109/TAP.1978.1141797
    [5]
    Carron N J, Longmire C L. Scaling behavior of the time-dependent SGEMP boundary layer[J]. IEEE Trans Nuclear Science, 1978, 25(6): 1329-1335. doi: 10.1109/TNS.1978.4329533
    [6]
    周辉, 李宝忠, 王立君, 等. 不同注量X射线系统电磁脉冲响应的数值计算[J]. 计算物理, 1999, 16(2): 157-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSWL902.007.htm

    Zhou Hui, Li Baozhong, Wang Lijun, et al. The calculation of SGEMP response in various ranges of X-ray fluence. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 1999, 16(2): 157-161 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSWL902.007.htm
    [7]
    程引会, 周辉, 李保忠, 等. 光电子发射引起的柱腔内系统电磁脉冲的模拟[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2004, 16(8): 1029-1032. http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/624

    Cheng Yinhui, Zhou Hui, Li Baozhong, et al. Simulation of system-generated electromagnetic pulse caused by emitted photoelectron in cavity. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2004, 16(8): 1029-1032 http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/624
    [8]
    周辉, 程引会, 李宝忠, 等. 系统电磁脉冲边界层准稳态特性研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2001, 13(1): 72-75. http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/1535

    Zhou Hui, Cheng Yinhui, Li Baozhong, et al. Characteristics of steady-state SGEMP boundary layer. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2001, 13(1): 72-75 http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/1535
    [9]
    Karzas W J, Latter R. Electromagnetic radiation from a nuclear explosion in space[J]. Phys Rev, 1962, 126(6): 1919-1926. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.126.1919
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Zhang Yong, Liu Zhen, Ruiyu Zhu, Yan Keping. Experimental study on Escherichia coli treatment by pulsed xenon lamp[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202537.240229
    [2]Chen Peng, Mao Daichun, Chen Siyu, Chen Nuo, Zhang Yilong. Design of short-arc xenon flashlamp power supply based on flyback topology and RC isolation trigger network[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(3): 035002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.200316
    [3]Chang Lihua, Wang Xu, Wen Weifeng, Song Zhenfei, Wang Wei, Ran Maojie, He Hui, Gao Peng. New development of laser illumination technology for high-speed photography[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(4): 040101. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180042
    [4]Li Bo, Li Boting, Huang Bin, Zhang Xin, Li Xiqin, Zhao Juan. Design of high reliability pulse xenon lamp power supply[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(06): 065004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160468
    [5]Ren Qingyi, Chen Min, Huang Bin, Ding Mingjun, Xie Min. Control system and Xe-flash lamp power supply of high speed imaging for detonation experiments[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(05): 055001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.055001
    [6]Chang Lihua, He Hui, Wen Weifeng, Gu Zhuowei, Li Zeren, Peng Qixian, Wang Xu, Li Jian, Qian Weixin, Liu Ningwen, Zhao Xincai, Wang Wei. Ultrahigh-speed simultaneous framing and streak photography of magnetic flux compression by explosive cylindrical implosion[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(11): 115002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.115002
    [7]Yang Zefeng, Mo Yongpeng, Jia Shenli, Liu Jianjun, Li Haibing, Yao Xueling, Li Xingwen. Experimental study on influence of cut current tail on xenon flashlamp work performance[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(09): 092004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.092004
    [8]Liu Jianjun, Li Haibing, Guo Xiangchao, Wu Ruihua, Shao Ruoyan, Liang Hairong, Lin Wenzheng, Hu Lili. Thermal damage mechanism of xenon lamp silica envelope during high-power discharge[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(08): 082004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.082004
    [9]Li Xiqin, Zhao Juan, Wu Hongguang, Liu Yuntao, Ding Mingjun. Design of xenon flash lamp supply adopting integrally triggering and pre-ionization[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(07): 075004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.075004
    [10]Li Jie, Li Xi, Xie Yutong, Wang Yuan, Jiang Xiaoguo, Long Jidong, Zhang Linwen. High speed imaging of DBD excited by sub-microsecond pulse power at atmospheric air[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(04): 045035. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.045035
    [11]Shao Tao, Zhang Cheng, Li Wenfeng, Yu Yang, Zhang Dongdong, Yan Ping. High speed imaging of nanosecond-pulse dielectric barrier discharge in atmospheric air[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(03): 612-616. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122403.0612
    [12]Liu Ningwen, Chang Lihua, Xiao Zhengfei, Li Jian, Zhao Xincai, Shang Changshui, Tian Jianhua. Measuring gating time of gated image intensifier[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(10): 2447-2450. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122410.2447
    [13]Jia Shenli, Li Xingwen, Li Rui, Liu JianJun, Li Haibing. Characteristics of plasma channel in high power pulsed xenon flashlamps[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(01): 248-252.
    [14]Chang Lihua, Li Zuoyou, Xiao Zhengfei, Zou Liyong, Liu Jinhong, Xiong Xueshi. 高速摄影在流体动力学不稳定性研究中的应用[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(06): 1479-1482. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122406.1479
    [15]Zhang Chu, Lin Dejiang, Shen Hongbin, Xu Chunmei, Chen Xiaohan. Effect of capacitor loss on discharging characteristics of xenon flash lamp[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(10): 2474-2478. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122410.2474
    [16]ma yongbo, peng shuming, long xinggui, fu xuemei, cao qingwei, yang benfu, yan dengyun. Influencing factors of life of high power linear xenon-filled flash lamp[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(10): 0- .
    [17]wen ming, hong yan-ji, wang jun, yang jian. High speed photography measurement of impulse coupling coefficient based on compound pendulum model[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2006, 18(07): 0- .
    [18]zhu jun, zhang lin-wen, long ji-dong, li jing, yu hai-jun, shang chang-shui, li jian. Measurement and simulation of the back-ejecta of tantalum target material impacted by high intensity current pulse electron beam[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2005, 17(04): 0- .
    [19]yang wen yuan, ding wu. A novel high power and high frequency coaxial transittime oscillator[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2003, 15(04): 0- .
    [20]chang li-hua, wang wei, liu ning-wen, yang li-bing, shang chang-shui, li jian. Study on gas-puff Z-pinch by high speed photography[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2003, 15(04): 0- .
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 王桔，饶大幸，贺瑞敬，高妍琦，崔勇，赵晓晖，史海涛，隋展，黄昌清. 幅度调制器对宽带低相干光时频特性的影响. 强激光与粒子束. 2023(05): 26-32 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04050100150200
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 21.3 %FULLTEXT: 21.3 %META: 73.6 %META: 73.6 %PDF: 5.1 %PDF: 5.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.5 %其他: 7.5 %其他: 1.0 %其他: 1.0 %Armenia: 0.1 %Armenia: 0.1 %Australia: 0.1 %Australia: 0.1 %Canada: 0.2 %Canada: 0.2 %Canton: 0.0 %Canton: 0.0 %Central District: 0.0 %Central District: 0.0 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Edinburg: 0.1 %Edinburg: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Indonesia: 0.1 %Indonesia: 0.1 %Korea Republic of: 0.1 %Korea Republic of: 0.1 %Pakistan: 0.1 %Pakistan: 0.1 %Poland: 0.1 %Poland: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Romania: 0.1 %Romania: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.0 %Serbia: 0.1 %Serbia: 0.1 %Singapore: 0.2 %Singapore: 0.2 %Taichung: 0.0 %Taichung: 0.0 %Taiwan, China: 0.1 %Taiwan, China: 0.1 %Turkey: 0.2 %Turkey: 0.2 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %[]: 1.1 %[]: 1.1 %上海: 1.8 %上海: 1.8 %东京: 0.4 %东京: 0.4 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %丹东: 0.0 %丹东: 0.0 %仁川广域: 0.1 %仁川广域: 0.1 %代尼兹利: 0.0 %代尼兹利: 0.0 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %儋州: 0.1 %儋州: 0.1 %光州广域: 0.1 %光州广域: 0.1 %六安: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰开斯特: 0.1 %兰开斯特: 0.1 %凉山: 0.4 %凉山: 0.4 %北京: 7.2 %北京: 7.2 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 5.0 %南京: 5.0 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %厦门: 0.0 %厦门: 0.0 %台中: 0.1 %台中: 0.1 %台北: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %商丘: 0.0 %商丘: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %夏尔迦: 0.0 %夏尔迦: 0.0 %多伦多: 0.1 %多伦多: 0.1 %大连: 0.4 %大连: 0.4 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安卡拉: 0.3 %安卡拉: 0.3 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %宜春: 0.0 %宜春: 0.0 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %岳阳: 0.0 %岳阳: 0.0 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德黑兰: 0.5 %德黑兰: 0.5 %慕尼黑: 0.1 %慕尼黑: 0.1 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %拉伯克: 0.1 %拉伯克: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.0 %揭阳: 0.0 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新德里: 0.1 %新德里: 0.1 %无锡: 0.0 %无锡: 0.0 %昆明: 2.6 %昆明: 2.6 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %普洱: 0.0 %普洱: 0.0 %曼谷: 0.1 %曼谷: 0.1 %杭州: 1.5 %杭州: 1.5 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %桃园: 0.3 %桃园: 0.3 %武汉: 0.7 %武汉: 0.7 %沈阳: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %海口: 0.0 %海口: 0.0 %海得拉巴: 0.3 %海得拉巴: 0.3 %淮北: 0.5 %淮北: 0.5 %深圳: 1.8 %深圳: 1.8 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %漯河: 1.2 %漯河: 1.2 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %班加罗尔: 0.6 %班加罗尔: 0.6 %益阳: 0.0 %益阳: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %科隆: 0.1 %科隆: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %绵阳: 0.4 %绵阳: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 29.6 %芒廷维尤: 29.6 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 1.6 %苏州: 1.6 %苏拉特: 0.1 %苏拉特: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %萨那: 0.2 %萨那: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %西宁: 17.4 %西宁: 17.4 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %铁岭: 0.2 %铁岭: 0.2 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %阿菲永卡拉希萨尔: 0.1 %阿菲永卡拉希萨尔: 0.1 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %其他其他ArmeniaAustraliaCanadaCantonCentral DistrictChinaEdinburgIndiaIndonesiaKorea Republic ofPakistanPolandRochesterRomaniaSeattleSerbiaSingaporeTaichungTaiwan, ChinaTurkeyUnited States[]上海东京东莞中山临汾丹东仁川广域代尼兹利佛山儋州光州广域六安兰州兰开斯特凉山北京匹兹堡十堰南京南通厦门台中台北台州合肥哈尔滨哥伦布商丘嘉兴夏尔迦多伦多大连天津太原威海宁波安卡拉安康宜春宣城岳阳常州广州廊坊张家口徐州德黑兰慕尼黑成都扬州拉伯克揭阳新乡新德里无锡昆明晋城普洱曼谷杭州格兰特县桃园武汉沈阳洛阳济南海口海得拉巴淮北深圳温州湖州湛江漯河濮阳烟台班加罗尔益阳石家庄福州科隆秦皇岛绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州苏拉特莫斯科萍乡萨那衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安诺沃克贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆铁岭长春长沙阿菲永卡拉希萨尔青岛马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1110) PDF downloads(147) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2014 Science and Technology Information Center of China Academy of Engineering Physics 蜀ICP备11018116号-4

    Mailing Address: Box 805, box 919, Mianyang, Sichuan (621900) Address: Science and Technology Information Center of Science City, Youxian District, Mianyang City, Sichuan Province Tel: 0816-2485753

    Fax: 0816-2483701 Email: HPLPB@caep.cn

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  support: info@rhhz.net

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return