Simulation of one-dimensional system generated electromagnetic pulse boundary layer

Sun Huifang; Dong Zhiwei; Zhang Fang

doi:10.11884/HPLPB201830.170210

Volume 30 Issue 1

Jan. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2018 > 30(1): 013004

Sun Huifang, Dong Zhiwei, Zhang Fang. Simulation of one-dimensional system generated electromagnetic pulse boundary layer[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 013004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170210

Citation:

Sun Huifang, Dong Zhiwei, Zhang Fang. Simulation of one-dimensional system generated electromagnetic pulse boundary layer[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 013004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170210

Citation:

PDF( 9804 KB)

Simulation of one-dimensional system generated electromagnetic pulse boundary layer

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170210

Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, P.O.Box 8009, Beijing 100094, China

Received Date: 2017-06-15
Rev Recd Date: 2017-09-05
Publish Date: 2018-01-15

Abstract

Abstract

The one-dimensional system generated electromagnetic pulse(SGEMP) boundary layer is simulated by PIC code of quasi-first principle. The SGEMP effects of monoenergetic emission model are studied—the photoelectrons are emitted normally at 3.3×10²⁰m^-2·s^-1 all with 2 keV energy from infinitely large dielectric plane while positive charges are left on the plane. When the steady state is reached, the maximum distance the electrons travel is oscillating between 5.8 cm and 7.5 cm, the charge density at z=0 is oscillating within (6.0-9.0)×10^－6C/m³ and electric field at the surface is 50-55kV/m. The build-up time of quasi-steady state is 14.0 ns. The simulation results of steady state accord with the theoretic results, and the simulation results could image the forming process and the adiabatic oscillation of the steady state more clearly than the theoretic results. The modeling by PIC code to study SGEMP effects is validated.
- photoelectron,
- system generated electromagnetic pulse,
- one-dimensional boundary layer,
- PIC code

FullText(HTML)

References(9)

References

[1]	王泰春, 贺云汉, 王玉芝. 电磁脉冲导论[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2011. Wang Taichun, He Yunhan, Wang Yuzhi. Introduction to electromagnetic pulse. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2011
[2]	Wenaas E P, Rogers S. Sensitivity of SGEMP to input parameters[J]. IEEE Trans Nuclear Science, 1975, 22(6): 2362-2367. doi: 10.1109/TNS.1975.4328134
[3]	Woods A J, Wennas E P. Scaling laws for SGEMP[J]. IEEE Trans Nuclear Science, 1976, 23(6): 1903-1908. doi: 10.1109/TNS.1976.4328597
[4]	Higgins D F, Lee K S H, Marin L. System-generated EMP[J]. IEEE Trans Antennas and Propagation, 1978, 26(1): 14-22. doi: 10.1109/TAP.1978.1141797
[5]	Carron N J, Longmire C L. Scaling behavior of the time-dependent SGEMP boundary layer[J]. IEEE Trans Nuclear Science, 1978, 25(6): 1329-1335. doi: 10.1109/TNS.1978.4329533
[6]	周辉, 李宝忠, 王立君, 等. 不同注量X射线系统电磁脉冲响应的数值计算[J]. 计算物理, 1999, 16(2): 157-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSWL902.007.htm Zhou Hui, Li Baozhong, Wang Lijun, et al. The calculation of SGEMP response in various ranges of X-ray fluence. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 1999, 16(2): 157-161 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSWL902.007.htm
[7]	程引会, 周辉, 李保忠, 等. 光电子发射引起的柱腔内系统电磁脉冲的模拟[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2004, 16(8): 1029-1032. http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/624 Cheng Yinhui, Zhou Hui, Li Baozhong, et al. Simulation of system-generated electromagnetic pulse caused by emitted photoelectron in cavity. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2004, 16(8): 1029-1032 http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/624
[8]	周辉, 程引会, 李宝忠, 等. 系统电磁脉冲边界层准稳态特性研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2001, 13(1): 72-75. http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/1535 Zhou Hui, Cheng Yinhui, Li Baozhong, et al. Characteristics of steady-state SGEMP boundary layer. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2001, 13(1): 72-75 http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/1535
[9]	Karzas W J, Latter R. Electromagnetic radiation from a nuclear explosion in space[J]. Phys Rev, 1962, 126(6): 1919-1926. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.126.1919