Two parameter optimization methods for large aperture mirror

Shen Zhanpeng; Chen Xiaojuan; Chen Xueqian; Fan Xuanhua

doi:10.11884/HPLPB201830.180011

Volume 30 Issue 6

Jun. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2018 > 30(6): 062001

Shen Zhanpeng, Chen Xiaojuan, Chen Xueqian, et al. Two parameter optimization methods for large aperture mirror[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 062001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180011

Citation:

Shen Zhanpeng, Chen Xiaojuan, Chen Xueqian, et al. Two parameter optimization methods for large aperture mirror[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 062001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180011

Citation:

PDF( 4668 KB)

Two parameter optimization methods for large aperture mirror

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180011

Institute of Systems Engineering, CAEP, P.O.Box 919-401, Mianyang 621999, China

Received Date: 2018-01-10
Rev Recd Date: 2018-02-09
Publish Date: 2018-06-15

Abstract

Abstract

Much deformation of the large aperture mirror by deadweight leads to large PV (peak-to-valley) value of its aperture surface, and it is hard to ensure the point accuracy on laser beams of optical facility. Finite element model is built up to calculate the PV value of the mirror surface in this paper. Moreover, parameters including position and size of erection column as well as the mirror thickness are optimized in order to minimize the PV value of the aperture surface. Both the direct optimization based on finite element model and the optimization based on surrogate model are adopted herein, and the PV value is reduced by 74% of its initial value as a result. In contrast to direct optimization, optimization based on surrogate model conveniently provides the objective variation with design variables and sensitivity analysis as well, which brings much benefit for structure design. In case of numerous and wide-range design variables, it is suggested to firstly decrease the design range according to prior knowledge or low-fidelity surrogate model and then optimize the parameters based on high-fidelity surrogate model within the shrunk range in order to avoid large amount of calculation. Furthermore, a scheme of four-cylinder support is recommended to replace the three-cylinder support for smaller PV value according to the optimization result.
- peak-to-valley value,
- finite element model,
- optimization,
- surrogate model,
- sensitivity analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(12)

References

[1]	Trummer D J, Foley R J, Shaw G S. Stability of optical elements in the NIF target area building[R]. UCRL-JC-129682, 1998.
[2]	徐元利, 吴文凯, 陈学前, 等. ICF装置靶场结构总体稳定性设计[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2009, 21(10): 1485-1488. http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/2362 Xu Yuanli, Wu Wenkai, Chen Xueqian, et al. Structural systemic stability design of inertial confinement fusion facility target area. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2009, 21(10): 1485-1488 http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/2362
[3]	曹庭分, 熊召, 徐旭, 等. 大口径KDP晶体夹持方式对面形的影响[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2011, 48(8): 138-141. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGDJ201108021.htm Cao Tingfen, Xiong Zhao, Xu Xu, et al. Mounting ways and surface figure of large-aperture KDP crystal. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 48(8): 138-141 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGDJ201108021.htm
[4]	陈晓娟, 傅学农, 吴文凯, 等. 基于Pro/M的大口径反射镜的变形分析及其支撑优化[J]. 机械设计, 2008, 25(2): 68-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1616.2008.02.038 Chen Xiaojuan, Fu Xuenong, Wu Wenkai, et al. Deformation analysis on large caliber reflector and its support optimization based on Pro/M. Journal of Machine Design, 2008, 25(2): 68-70 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1616.2008.02.038
[5]	陈晓娟, 王美聪, 吴文凯, 等. 大口径反射镜波前畸变控制技术[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2011, 23(12): 3325-3328. http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/5704 Chen Xiaojuan, Wang Meicong, Wu Wenkai, et al. Wavefront distribution control for large aperture mirror. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(12): 3325-3328 http://www.hplpb.com.cn/article/id/5704
[6]	Zhu J D, Wang Y J, Collette M. A multi-objective variable-fidelity optimization method for genetic algorithms[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2014, 46(4): 521-542. doi: 10.1080/0305215X.2013.786063
[7]	Li M, Li G, Azarm S. A Kriging meta-model assisted multi-objective genetic algorithm for design optimization[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2008, 130(3): 1-10.
[8]	Dey A, Sarkar D. A note on the construction of orthogonal Latin hypercube designs[J]. Journal of Combinatorial Designs, 2016, 24(3): 105-111.
[9]	Georgiou S D, Stylianou S. Block-circulant matrices for constructing optimal Latin hypercube designs[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2011, 141(5): 1933-1943.
[10]	Krige D G. A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand[J]. Journal of the Chemical, Metallurgical and Mining Engineering Society of South Africa, 1951, 52(6): 119-139.
[11]	Forrester A I J, Sóbester A, Keane A J. Engineering design via surrogate modelling: A practical guide[M]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2008.
[12]	Helton J C, Johnson J D, Sallaberry C J, et al. Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2006, 91(10/11): 1175-1209.