Volume 30 Issue 9
Sep.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Sun Mingjun, Sun Dawei, Pan Nan. Radiation impact quantification analysis for fuel handing accident[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 096004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180058
Citation: Sun Mingjun, Sun Dawei, Pan Nan. Radiation impact quantification analysis for fuel handing accident[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 096004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180058

Radiation impact quantification analysis for fuel handing accident

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180058
  • Received Date: 2018-02-28
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-04-09
  • Publish Date: 2018-09-15
  • Based on Hongyanhe nuclear power plant, research on radionuclide source, transfer and release pathways were carried out, for CPR1000 fuel handing accident. The source term analytical models were constructed, including fuel reserve room and environment. On this basis, the radiation impact of an assembly drop accident was quantitatively estimated. The results show that public doses with 16 directions of exclusion area boundary and planning restricted area outer boundary satisfied the GB6249-2011 dose limits with some margin. The above doses were determined using top 0.5% meteorology. By sensitivity analysis of key parameters, direction of the largest dose, predominant nuclide and key time period were identified. Furthermore, the rationality of accident cutoff time taken as 12 h, and the necessity of fuel operation starting time taken as 100 h were proved. Meanwhile, the effects of scrubbing depth and normal ventilation isolation delay time on public doses were studied. The results show that public dose decreased exponentially with the increase of scrubbing depth, while it increased rapidly with the extension of normal ventilation isolation delay time, which can support the decision of nuclear power plant design.
  • loading
  • [1]
    GB6249-2011, 核动力厂环境辐射防护规定[S].

    GB6249-2011. Regulations for environmental radiation protection of nuclear power plant
    [2]
    RG1.183-2000, Alternative radiological source terms for evaluating design basis accidents at nuclear power reactors[S].
    [3]
    RG1.195-2003, Methods and assumptions for evaluating radiological consequences of design basis accidents at light-water nuclear power reactors[S].
    [4]
    卢玉楷. 简明放射性同位素应用手册[M]. 上海: 上海科学普及出版社, 2001: 287-291.

    Lu Yukai. Concise application manual of radioisotopes. Shanghai: Shanghai Popular Science Press, 2001: 287-291
    [5]
    孙大威, 梅其良, 付亚茹, 等. 基于AST方法的AP1000失水事故放射性后果评价[J]. 核科学与工程, 2016, 36(1): 103-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXY201601015.htm

    Sun Dawei, Mei Qiliang, Fu Yaru, et al. AP1000 loss of coolant accident radiological consequence assessment based on AST method. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2016, 36(1): 103-108 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXY201601015.htm
    [6]
    Burley G. Evaluation of fission product release and transport[R]. Washington: Radiological Safety Branch Division of Reactor Licensing, 1971.
    [7]
    RG1.25-1972, Assumptions used for evaluating the potential radiological consequences of a fuel handling accident in the fuel handling and storage facility for boiling and pressurized water reactors[S].
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(2)

    Article views (1185) PDF downloads(103) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return