Chen Qiang, Xu Ke, Chen Zhenzhen, et al. System-level electrostatic discharge simulation based on transmission line pulse modeling[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31: 103208. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190113
Citation: Chen Qiang, Xu Ke, Chen Zhenzhen, et al. System-level electrostatic discharge simulation based on transmission line pulse modeling[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31: 103208. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190113

System-level electrostatic discharge simulation based on transmission line pulse modeling

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190113
  • Received Date: 2019-04-17
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-05-16
  • Publish Date: 2019-10-15
  • Effective protection can be conducted before an electronic system is measured through system-level ESD simulation. In this paper, the spice behavioral modeling for the transient voltage suppressor and IC pins are presented using the measured transmission line pulse (TLP) data. A system-level ESD simulation methodology is proposed, including the equivalent circuit model of ESD pulse source, S-parameter model of PCB board, TLP model of TVS protection diode, IC pins and co-simulation technology. A switch chip protect circuit is simulated and measured under IEC 61000-4-2 ESD stress. The good agreement between simulated and measured voltage waveforms demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed simulation method.
  • [1]
    Jiang X, Shi Q, Gao Y. Integrated circuit ESD protection structure failure analysis based on TLP technique[C]//International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology IEEE. 2016.
    [2]
    Honda M. A review of EMI problem caused by ESD phenomena[C]//13th RCJ Reliability Symposium. 2003: 183-186.
    [3]
    Yoshida T, Masui N. A study on system-level ESD stress simulation using circuit simulator[C]// Proc of APEMC. 2013.
    [4]
    Scholz M, Chen S, Vandersteen G. Comparison of system-level ESD design methodologies—Towards the efficient and ESD robust design of systems[J]. IEEE Trans Device Mater Rel, 2013, 13(1): 213-222. doi: 10.1109/TDMR.2012.2231414
    [5]
    Robert M, Seol B, Chang N. System-level ESD failure diagnosis with chip-package-system dynamic ESD simulation[C]//Electrical Overstress/electrostatic Discharge Symposium IEEE. 2014.
    [6]
    IEC61000-4-2, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)-Part 4-2: Testing and measurement techniques—Electrostatic discharge immunity test[S].
    [7]
    Pommerenke D, Fan J, Drewniak J. Simulation challenges in system level electrostatic discharge modeling[C]//Proc 2016 IEEE/ACES Int Conf Wireless Inf Technol Syst Appl Comput Electromagn, 2016: 1-2.
    [8]
    Yang S, Pommerenke D J. Effect of different load impedances on ESD generators and ESD generator SPICE models[J]. IEEE Trans Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2018, 60(6): 1726-1733.
    [9]
    Jahanzeb A, Lou L, Duvvury C, et al. TLP characterization for testing system level ESD performance[C]//EOS/ESD Symp Proc. 2010.
    [10]
    Scholz M, Linten D, Thijs S, et al. ESD on-wafer characterization: Is TLP still the right measurement tool[J]. IEEE Trans Instrumentation and Measurement, 2009, 58(10): 3418-3426. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2009.2017657
    [11]
    Yoshida T. A study on transmission line modeling method for system-level ESD stress simulation[C]//Proc 2015 Asia-Pacific Symp Electromagn Compat. 2018: 577-580.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Han Caozheng, Wang Wubin, Zhao Wei, Chen Ruitao, Ma Xingwang, Li Yanling, Bai Jiaqi. Protection design of BDS/GPS to resist high power microwave[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36(12): 123001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.240219
    [2]Zhang Jingqi, Qin Feng, Gao Yuan, Zhong Shouhong, Wang Zhen. Design and experiment of wideband electromagnetic pulse protection circuit with effective suppression capability[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35(2): 023004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202335.220257
    [3]Fan Yuqing, Cheng Erwei, Wei Ming, Zhang Qinglong, Chen Yazhou. Analysis on the interference effect of electrostatic discharge of GNSS receiver on aircraft[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31(12): 123201. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190268
    [4]Xie Xining, Hu Xiaofeng. Design of an electrostatic discharge simulator[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31(6): 063205. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190057
    [5]Xu Xiaoying, Shu Xiaorong, Liu Pengyu, Gan Yingjie, Zhang Chengming. Experimental characteristics of surface discharging for air electrostatic discharge on display[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31(6): 063203. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190035
    [6]Wang Xiangyu, Fan Yajun, Qiao Hanqing, Lu Yanlei, Zhu Yufeng, Xia Wenfeng, Zhang Xingjia. Design of a coaxial Marx generator and field-circuit co-simulation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31(11): 115001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190125
    [7]Wang Yajie, He Pengjun, Jing Xiaopeng, Tie Weihao, Xie Jiangyuan, Zhao Chengguang. Simulation and calculation of pulsed power source based on drift step recovery diode switching[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(9): 095005. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170398
    [8]Wu Huancheng, Hu Jinguang, Zhong Longquan, Lin Jiangchuan. Field-circuit co-simulation and experiment of electromagnetic energy selective surface[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(09): 093203. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170088
    [9]Zhang Xijun, Zhang Liting, Wang Shuping, Zhao Min. Effect of length of transmission line on performance test of electrostatic discharge protection device[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(10): 103205. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170156
    [10]Li Yong, Xie Haiyan, Yang Zhiqiang, Xia Hongfu, Xuan Chun, Wang Jianguo. Parameter extraction of transient voltage suppressor diode[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(03): 033202. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.033202
    [11]Yang Cheng, Liu Peiguo, Liu Jibin, Zhou Dongming, Li Gaosheng. Transient response of energy selective surface[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(04): 1045-1049.
    [12]zhang wei, du zhengwei. Simulation of irradiation effects of high power microwave on PCB circuits[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(11): 0- .
    [13]xiong ling-ling, lü bai-da. Theoretical models describing far-field intensity distributions of laser diode[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2008, 20(02): 0- .
    [14]qi shu-feng, liu shang-he, liu hong-bing, yang jie. Latent failure of 2SC3356 caused by electrostatic discharge[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2007, 19(04): 0- .
    [15]he qi-yuan, liu shang-he, xu xiao-ying, wang shao-guang, chen jing-ping. Influence of approaching speed on air electrostatic discharge[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2007, 19(03): 0- .
    [16]yang jie, wang chang-he, liu shang-he. Electromagnetic pulse sensitive ports of micro-wave low-noise transistors[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2007, 19(01): 0- .
    [17]quan lin, zhang yong-min, tu jing, chen zhi-hua, lai ding-guo, fan ya-jun, shao hao. Stability of pulse X-ray spectrum field generated by intense diode[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2006, 18(02): 0- .
    [18]bi zeng-jun, sheng song-lin, sun chi, liu shang-he. A numerical model of electromagnetic fields generated by electrostatic discharge spark[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2003, 15(06): 0- .
    [19]hou min-sheng, wang shu-ping. Simulator of electromagnetism pulse produced during electrostatic discharge[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2002, 14(02): 0- .
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 王淼,李嘉豪,汤浩,郭亚. ESD保护电路在HDMI板级信号完整性中的影响分析及其布局优化研究. 现代电子技术. 2024(08): 68-74 .
    2. 付路,阎照文,刘玉竹,苏丽轩. 基于分段线性模型针对传输线脉冲瞬态干扰信号的芯片协同防护设计方法. 电子与信息学报. 2023(09): 3263-3271 .
    3. 付路,阎照文,刘玉竹,苏丽轩. 芯片传导瞬态电磁干扰下的防护特性研究. 安全与电磁兼容. 2022(04): 38-42+66 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 22.9 %FULLTEXT: 22.9 %META: 73.2 %META: 73.2 %PDF: 3.8 %PDF: 3.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.0 %其他: 5.0 %其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %Austria: 0.1 %Austria: 0.1 %China: 0.7 %China: 0.7 %India: 0.0 %India: 0.0 %Taiwan, China: 0.2 %Taiwan, China: 0.2 %Taoyuan District: 0.1 %Taoyuan District: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 3.0 %上海: 3.0 %东莞: 0.4 %东莞: 0.4 %中山: 0.0 %中山: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %丹东: 0.0 %丹东: 0.0 %丽水: 0.2 %丽水: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %内江: 0.0 %内江: 0.0 %北京: 13.4 %北京: 13.4 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 1.1 %南京: 1.1 %南平: 0.1 %南平: 0.1 %南通: 0.0 %南通: 0.0 %台北: 0.2 %台北: 0.2 %台州: 0.7 %台州: 0.7 %台湾省: 0.1 %台湾省: 0.1 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %孝感: 0.0 %孝感: 0.0 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安康: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %宜春: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.0 %宝鸡: 0.0 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宿州: 0.1 %宿州: 0.1 %巴中: 0.0 %巴中: 0.0 %布加勒斯特: 0.2 %布加勒斯特: 0.2 %常州: 0.0 %常州: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广安: 0.0 %广安: 0.0 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.0 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.0 %张家口: 0.1 %张家口: 0.1 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %无锡: 0.6 %无锡: 0.6 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %普洱: 0.0 %普洱: 0.0 %杭州: 2.1 %杭州: 2.1 %桂林: 0.0 %桂林: 0.0 %梅州: 0.1 %梅州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.0 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %海得拉巴: 0.1 %海得拉巴: 0.1 %深圳: 1.0 %深圳: 1.0 %温哥华: 0.0 %温哥华: 0.0 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.8 %漯河: 0.8 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %美国: 0.1 %美国: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 22.2 %芒廷维尤: 22.2 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 34.1 %西宁: 34.1 %西安: 0.8 %西安: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.5 %运城: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %重庆: 0.0 %重庆: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %首尔: 0.0 %首尔: 0.0 %首尔特别: 0.1 %首尔特别: 0.1 %香港: 0.0 %香港: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %其他其他AustriaChinaIndiaTaiwan, ChinaTaoyuan District[]上海东莞中山临汾丹东丽水保定内江北京十堰南京南平南通台北台州台湾省合肥咸阳哥伦布嘉兴大连天津孝感宁波安康宜春宝鸡宣城宿州巴中布加勒斯特常州平顶山广安广州弗吉尼亚州张家口惠州成都扬州无锡昆明晋城普洱杭州桂林梅州武汉沈阳济南海得拉巴深圳温哥华温州湖州湘潭漯河珠海石家庄秦皇岛美国芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡阳衢州西宁西安贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆金华长春长沙青岛首尔首尔特别香港马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (1818) PDF downloads(89) Cited by(7)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return