Volume 32 Issue 4
Mar.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  High Power Laser and Particle Beams  > 2020  >  32(4): 045001
Chen Zhiqiang, Jia Wei, He Xiaoping, et al. Double peak phenomenon of applied pulse voltage induced by flashover around parallel-plate electrodes[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31: 070005. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.180383
Citation: Jia Wei, Chen Zhiqiang, Guo Fan, et al. Comparison of insulation properties of several liquid dielectrics under nanosecond pulses[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2020, 32: 045001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202032.190338
shu

Comparison of insulation properties of several liquid dielectrics under nanosecond pulses

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202032.190338
  • 1.

    State Key Laboratory of Intense Pulsed Radiation Simulation and Effect, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, China

  • 2.

    State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

  • Received Date: 2019-09-05
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-11-29
  • Publish Date: 2020-03-06
    Abstract

  • Based on the self-developed nanosecond pulsed test platform with output voltage of 30 ns risetime and 100 ns half width, and the standard dielectric strength DC tester, the breakdown characteristics of four liquid dielectrics (transformer oil, glycerol, deionized water and Galden HT200) under DC and nanosecond pulses were experimentally studied and compared. The following conclusions were obtained: (1)Under both DC and nanosecond pulse, Galden HT200 has the highest breakdown field strength which is more than 40% higher than that of the transformer oil. (2) Under the nanosecond pulse, the breakdown field strength of Galden HT200 and transformer oil both increased by 6.5-7 times than those under DC. And it took the shortest time(nanosecond scale) for Galden HT200 to breakdown, followed by the transformer oil(20 ns), then glycerol(45 ns) and deionized water(70 ns). (3) After multiple breakdowns, a lot of carbonized discharge products were accumulated at the electrode gap in the glycerol which has the largest viscosity coefficient. However, there are no obvious breakdown traces in the Galden HT200 and deionized water, which both have the smaller viscosity coefficient. But obvious shock waves were observed in the Galden HT200 and deionized water, which make the gap electrodes  loose.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(15)
  • [1]
    Ba um, C E. Reminiscences of high-power electromagnetic[J]. IEEE Transactions on electromagnetic compatibility, 2007, 49(2): 211-218. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2007.897147
    [2]
    刘培国, 刘晨曦, 谭剑锋, 等. 强电磁防护技术研究进展[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2015, 10(2):2-6. (Liu Peiguo, Liu Chenxi, Tan Jianfeng, et al. Analysis of the research development on HPM/EMP protection[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2015, 10(2): 2-6 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2015.02.002
    [3]
    邓建球, 郝翠. 强电磁脉冲耦合与电源防护研究[J]. 微波学报, 2017, 33(6):85-89. (Deng Jianqiu, Hao Cui. Research on powerful electromagnetic pulse coupling and power source protection[J]. Journal of Microwaves, 2017, 33(6): 85-89
    [4]
    Shi Lihua. An overview of the HEMP research in China[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2013(3): 422-430.
    [5]
    Wraight A, Prather W D. Developments in early-time (E1) high-altitude electromagnetic pulse(HEMP) test methods[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2013, 55(3): 492-499. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2013.2241442
    [6]
    Giri D V, Prather W D. High-altitude electromagnetic pulse(HEMP) risetime evolution of technology and standards exclusive for E1 environment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2013, 55(3): 1-8. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2013.2266211
    [7]
    谢彦召, 王赞基, 王群书, 等. 基于频域幅度谱数据重建电磁脉冲时域波形[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2004, 16(3):320-324. (Xie Yanzhao, Wang Zanji, Wang Qunshu, et al. Reconstruction of electromagnetic pulse wave based on the amplitude spectrum data[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2004, 16(3): 320-324
    [8]
    朱长青, 刘尚合, 魏明. 强电磁脉冲的有效带宽、测量带宽及来自上升时间的影响[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2005, 17(1):99-103. (Zhu Changqing, Liu Shanghe, Wei Ming. High-EMP effective bandwidth, measurement bandwidth and effect from rising time[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2005, 17(1): 99-103
    [9]
    Nyffeler M, Jaquier A, Reusser B, et al. VERIFY, a threat level NEMP simulator with a 1 ns risetime[C]//America Electromagnetic. 2006.
    [10]
    张帆, 何鹏军, 孔亮, 等. 宽带强电磁脉冲模拟器发展及设计研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2018, 30:013206. (Zhang Fan, He Pengjun, Kong Liang, et al. Survey and design study of mesoband high power electromagnetic pulse radiator[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 013206
    [11]
    张晋琪, 蒋兴亮, 陈志刚. 液体介质快脉冲电压下击穿特性研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2006, 18(6):1053-1056. (Zhang Jinqi, Jiang Xingliang, Chen Zhigang. Characteristics study of short-pulsed dielectric breakdown in liquids[J]. High Power Laser & Particle Beams, 2006, 18(6): 1053-1056
    [12]
    黄思思. 操作冲击电压作用下液体电介质的电场及空间电荷分布特性研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2013.

    Huang Sisi. Study on electric field and space charge distribution characteristics in liquid dielectric under switching impulse voltage. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2013
    [13]
    徐健. 高储能密度液体介质脉冲绝缘特性研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2014.

    Xu Jian. Study on the pulsed insulating characteristics of high energy storage density liquid dielectrics. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2014
    [14]
    Martin T H, Guenther A H. J. C. Martin on pulsed power[M]. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1996.
    [15]
    荀涛, 杨汉武, 张建德, 等. 加速器电水锤数值模拟与实验研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2010, 22(2):425-429. (Xun Tao, Yang Hanwu, Zhang Jiande, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation on water shocks due to pulsed discharge in accelerators[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(2): 425-429
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Wang Zhenchun, Hu Yan, Zhang Yuting. Circuit topology optimization and performance improvement of magnetic resistance coil launcher[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36(9): 095002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.240123
    [2]Zhao Yunru, Wang Quanfeng, Wu Qi. Statistical analysis on electromagnetic emission characteristics of phased array antenna[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(12): 123003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210389
    [3]Lian Zhongmou, Feng Gang, Tong Siyuan, Cheng Junsheng, Xiong Ling. Simulation analysis of background field enhancement of four-rail electromagnetic launcher[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2020, 32(10): 105003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202032.200135
    [4]Lin Lingshu, Yuan Weiqun, Zhao Ying, Wang Zhizeng, Yan Ping. Mechanical design of rail cooling pipe for electromagnetic launcher[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(2): 025003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170322
    [5]Zhao Ying, Yuan Weiqun, Xu Rong, Cheng Wenping, Che Yunlong, Xie Keyu, Yan Ping. Characteristics of the bus-bar of electromagnetic rail launcher[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(5): 055004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170411
    [6]Lin Lingshu, Yuan Weiqun, Zhao Ying, Wang Zhizeng, Yan Ping. Scaling method on electromagnetic railgun[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(01): 015007. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.015007
    [7]He Yong, Cheng Cheng, Song Shengyi, Guan Yongchao, Gao Guishan, Li Yexun, Qiu Xu. Suppressing of muzzle arc during railgun launch[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(02): 025003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.025003
    [8]Yin Qiang, Zhang He, Li Haojie, Shi Yunlei. Analysis of railgun in-bore magnetic field distribution at zero speed[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(02): 025008. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.025008
    [9]Zhao Shen, Zou Xiaobing, Zhu Xinlei, Shi Huantong, Luo Haiyun, Wang Xinxin. Current distribution in load cavity between X-pinches and current-return rods[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(04): 045045. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.045045
    [10]Guan Yongchao, Zou Wenkang, He Yong, Li Yexun, Qiu Xu, Gao Guishan, Cheng Cheng, Song Shengyi. Circuit simulation of the electromagnetic railgun system[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(11): 115001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.115001
    [11]Xu Weidong, Chen Yun, Yuan Weiqun, Zhao Ying, Wang Xianbin, Yan Ping. Design of armature with high muzzle velocity in the small caliber electromagnetic launcher[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(04): 045040. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.045040
    [12]Zhu Rengui, Li Zhiyuan, Zhang Qian, Wang Ruilin, Xing Yanchang. Initial contact status for interface between armature and rail in electromagnetic launch[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(11): 115003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.115003
    [13]Guan Xiaocun, Lu Junyong. Transient wear capacity calculation of armature-rail interface in pulse current[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(11): 115002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.115002
    [14]Zhao Ying, Xu Rong, Yuan Weiqun, Yan Ping, Xu Weidong, Xie Keyu, Wang Xianbin. Characteristics of high pulsed current electromagnetic rail launcher[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(09): 095004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.095004
    [15]Guan YonGchao, Ji Ce, Wei BinG, Qiu Xu, He YonG, SonG ShenGyi. Isolated voltage divider for electromagneticrail launcher[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(04): 793-796. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122404.0793
    [16]yang ye, liu yun, qin li, wang ye, liang xuemei, li zaijin, hu liming, shi jingjing, wang chao, wang lijun. Design of 808 nm high power diode laser bars[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(01): 0- .
    [17]sun peng, lei bin, li zhiyuan, guo chunlong. Finite element analysis on 3-D electromagnetic field of electromagnetic launching composite intercepting projectile[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(10): 0- .
    [18]wang qiang, guan yongchao, wang ganghua, xie long, jiang jihao. 3D finite element numerical calculation of C-shaped solid armatures in electromagnetic launch[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(04): 0- .
    [19]dong zhiwei, yu cuiying, zhao qiang, yang xianjun, xu fukai, wang guirong. Numerical study of impact of resistance and flux losses on helical magnetic flux compression generator[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(04): 0- .
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 李学生，张尊扬. 基于贝叶斯分类的变压器绕组故障诊断算法. 济南大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(04): 412-416 .
    2. 陈志强，贾伟，谢霖燊，郭帆，王程程，何小平，吴伟，汲胜昌. 圆形平板电极与薄膜层叠结构的沿面闪络性能. 强激光与粒子束. 2020(02): 97-103 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 23.0 %FULLTEXT: 23.0 %META: 75.7 %META: 75.7 %PDF: 1.3 %PDF: 1.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.1 %其他: 3.1 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %China: 0.9 %China: 0.9 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Pakistan: 0.2 %Pakistan: 0.2 %Puylaurens: 0.2 %Puylaurens: 0.2 %Ukraine: 0.2 %Ukraine: 0.2 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %丹东: 0.1 %丹东: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %利佛摩: 0.1 %利佛摩: 0.1 %北京: 15.5 %北京: 15.5 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %印多尔: 0.1 %印多尔: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.2 %咸阳: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔科夫: 0.8 %哈尔科夫: 0.8 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.2 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.2 %张家口: 0.5 %张家口: 0.5 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %桃园: 0.1 %桃园: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.5 %绵阳: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 10.4 %芒廷维尤: 10.4 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %西宁: 60.2 %西宁: 60.2 %西安: 1.0 %西安: 1.0 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %长沙: 0.2 %长沙: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %其他其他ChinaIndiaPakistanPuylaurensUkraine[]上海中山丹东六安利佛摩北京十堰南京印多尔台北台州咸阳哈尔滨哈尔科夫哥伦布孟买广州弗吉尼亚州张家口成都无锡昆明杭州格兰特县桃园武汉济南深圳湖州漯河石家庄秦皇岛绵阳芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州西宁西安西雅图运城郑州重庆长沙阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(3)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1435) PDF downloads(80) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2014 Science and Technology Information Center of China Academy of Engineering Physics 蜀ICP备11018116号-4

    Mailing Address: Box 805, box 919, Mianyang, Sichuan (621900) Address: Science and Technology Information Center of Science City, Youxian District, Mianyang City, Sichuan Province Tel: 0816-2485753

    Fax: 0816-2483701 Email: HPLPB@caep.cn

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  support: info@rhhz.net

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return