Volume 33 Issue 3
Mar.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Xiao Jing, Wu Gang, Wang Haiyang, et al. Horizontally polarized radiation-wave simulator with two different wire grating structures[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 033004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.200281
Citation: Xiao Jing, Wu Gang, Wang Haiyang, et al. Horizontally polarized radiation-wave simulator with two different wire grating structures[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 033004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.200281

Horizontally polarized radiation-wave simulator with two different wire grating structures

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.200281
  • Received Date: 2020-10-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2021-01-07
  • Available Online: 2021-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2021-03-05
  • This paper compares the E-field distributions of two horizontally polarized radiation-wave simulator with different wire grating structure. The antenna wires of one simulator are uniformly distributed on the ground, while the other simulator’s antenna wires are converged to several groups at the end. Meanwhile, the influences of wire number and group number on the radiated field are discussed. Results show that the E-fields below the bicone apex are not affected by the wire grating structure. While in other positions, the E-field characteristics of the two simulators are different: when the wire number is the same, the simulator with uniform wire will increase the E-field amplitude by 5% to 20%, but its rise time increases about 10% at the same time; the simulator whose antenna wires are converged shows lower E-field amplitude, but its rise time is shorter. Besides, the latter is easy to establish in practice. On the other hand, increasing the wire number and wire group is helpful to improve the radiation amplitude, but the improvement reduces gradually. If the wire number increases from 24 to 96, the rise time can be improved by about 10%, but the half width of radiated E-field shows little difference. The increase of group number will lead to longer rise time. Taking into account the variation law of the E-field and the complexity to establish, the wire number of the simulator with uniform wire can be set to 48, and for the simulator whose antenna wires are converged, the group number can be set to 16.
  • loading
  • [1]
    李亚南, 谭志良. 基于PIN二极管的快上升沿电磁脉冲防护模块设计与研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(10):2066-2072. (Li Ya’nan, Tan Zhiliang. Design and research of the fast rise time electromagnetic pulse protection module based on PIN diode[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(10): 2066-2072 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.10.021
    [2]
    刘青, 谢彦召. 高空电磁脉冲作用下埋地电缆的瞬态响应规律[J]. 高电压技术, 2017, 43(9):3014-3020. (Liu Qing, Xie Yanzhao. Transient response law of buried cable to high-altitude electromagnetic pulse[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2017, 43(9): 3014-3020
    [3]
    谢霖燊, 吴伟, 朱湘琴. 分布式负载垂直极化有界波电磁脉冲模拟器外泄场的规律分析[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2020, 32:055002. (Xie Linshen, Wu Wei, Zhu Xiangqin. Regularity analysis of leakage-field from vertically polarized bounded wave electromagnetic pulse simulator with distributed load[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2020, 32: 055002
    [4]
    Blundell R. Horizontally polarized dipole—II electromagnetic pulse simulator[C]//Proceedings of the European Electromagnetics International Symposium on Electromagnetic Environment and Consequences. 1994, 2: 1159-1165.
    [5]
    杜立航, 高成, 陈海林, 等. 金属挡板对平行线栅有界波模拟器的影响仿真研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2018, 30(7):073204. (Du Lihang, Gao Cheng, Chen Hailin, et al. Simulation study on influence of metal plate on parallel wire-grid bounded-wave simulator[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(7): 073204 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170465
    [6]
    Bailey V, Carboni V, Eichenberger C, et al. A 6-MV pulser to drive horizontally polarized EMP simulators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2010, 38(10): 2254-2258.
    [7]
    IEC 61000-2-9, Description of HEMP environment-radiation disturbance basic EMC publication[S].
    [8]
    傅海军, 张维刚, 岳思橙, 等. 系统级电磁脉冲模拟试验技术[J]. 现代防御技术, 2018, 46(3):127-132. (Fu Haijun, Zhang Weigang, Yue Sicheng, et al. Electromagnetic pulse simulating test methods on system level[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2018, 46(3): 127-132
    [9]
    Dhoot V, Gupta S. Return loss validation of a novel cantor based antenna using FIT and FDTD[C]//Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Communications and Signal Processing. Calicut: IEEE, 2011: 374-378.
    [10]
    Yao Lijun, Shen Tao, Kang Ning, et al. Time-domain simulation and measurement of a guided-wave EMP simulator’s field uniformity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2013, 55(6): 1187-1194. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2013.2257795
    [11]
    Giri D V, Baum C E. Design guidelines for flat-plate conical guided-wave EMP simulators with distributed terminators[R]. Sensor and Simulation Note 402, 1996.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(12)  / Tables(2)

    Article views (1038) PDF downloads(105) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return