Study on GIC algorithm of railway traction power supply system under action of late time HEMP

Gao Zhiwei; Zhou Yuxiang; Zhu Siyi

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202133.210061

Volume 33 Issue 9

Sep. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2021 > 33(9): 093001

Wang Lei, Zhang Cheng, Luo Zhenbing, et al. Compact microsecond-pulse generator for plasma synthetic jet[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28: 045013. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.125013

Citation:

Gao Zhiwei, Zhou Yuxiang, Zhu Siyi. Study on GIC algorithm of railway traction power supply system under action of late time HEMP[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 093001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210061

Wang Lei, Zhang Cheng, Luo Zhenbing, et al. Compact microsecond-pulse generator for plasma synthetic jet[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28: 045013. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.125013

Citation:

PDF( 1144 KB)

Study on GIC algorithm of railway traction power supply system under action of late time HEMP

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210061

School of Information Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China

Received Date: 2021-03-01
Rev Recd Date: 2021-08-10

Available Online: 2021-09-04

Publish Date: 2021-09-15

Abstract

Abstract

The late effect of high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (E₃) will cause dramatic changes in the Earth's magnetic field and form a ground induced electric field. The induced electric field is equivalent to forming a loop between the excitation source and the ground long-distance conductor and the Earth, generating a geomagnetic induction current (GIC). GIC can cause DC bias of the transformer in the traction power supply system, thereby seriously threatening the safe operation of the traction power supply system. Based on the plane wave theory, the layered Earth conductivity model and the circuit model of the traction power supply system, this paper proposes the GIC algorithm of the traction power supply system under the action of E₃, and takes the railway traction power supply system with return line direct power supply as an example. Calculating the system GIC situation shows that the GIC in the traction power supply system under this power supply mode is far greater than the withstand value of the transformer and other equipment in the system. The study provides support for further research on the effect of the traction power supply system under the action of E₃, the selection of our domestic railway equipment, and disaster prevention.
- high-altitude electromagnetic pulse,
- E₃,
- geomagnetic induced current,
- layered earth conductivity model,
- traction power supply system

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	IEC 61000-2-9, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 2: environment—section 9: description of HEMP environment—radiated disturbance[S].
[2]	Gilbert J, Radasky W A, Smith K S, et al. HEMP TAPS/HEMP-PC audit report[R]. Meta R-131, 1999; DTRA-TR-00-1, 2002.
[3]	邢军强, 王菲, 韩刚, 等. 大地直流偏磁影响下电力变压器损耗及温升计算研究[J]. 电气技术, 2020, 21(1):20-24, 30. (Xing Junqiang, Wang Fei, Han Gang, et al. Research on loss and temperature rise calculation method of power transformer under the influence of geomagnetically induced current[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2020, 21(1): 20-24, 30 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3800.2020.01.007
[4]	师泯夏, 吴邦, 靳宇晖, 等. 直流偏磁对变压器影响研究综述[J]. 高压电器, 2018, 54(7):20-36, 43. (Shi Minxia, Wu Bang, Jin Yuhui, et al. Research summary on the impacts of DC magnetic bias on transformer[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2018, 54(7): 20-36, 43
[5]	Gilbert J, Kappenman J, Radasky W, et al. The late-time (E3) high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) and its impact on the U. S. power grid[R]. Goleta: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2010.
[6]	Hutchins T. Modeling, simulation, and mitigation of the impacts of the late time (E3) high-altitude electromagnetic pulse on power systems[D]. Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016.
[7]	Lee R H W, Shetye K S, Birchfield A B, et al. Using detailed ground modeling to evaluate electric grid impacts of late-time high-altitude electromagnetic pulses (E3 HEMP)[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(2): 1549-1557. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2878533
[8]	余同彬, 周璧华. HEMP作用下近地有限长电缆外皮感应电流研究[J]. 解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 3(1):8-12. (Yu Tongbin, Zhou Bihua. Study of HEMP induced current in cables with finite length near the ground[J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology, 2002, 3(1): 8-12
[9]	赵志斌, 柯俊吉, 马丽斌. 高空核电磁脉冲晚期效应对电网稳定性影响的研究[J]. 电气技术, 2015, 16(9):16-19. (Zhao Zhibin, Ke Junji, Ma Libin. Research on impact of late-time HEMP to stability of power grids[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2015, 16(9): 16-19 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3800.2015.09.004
[10]	陈宇浩, 谢彦召, 刘民周, 等. 高空电磁脉冲作用下电力系统主要效应模式分析[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2019, 31:070007. (Chen Yuhao, Xie Yanzhao, Liu Minzhou, et al. Analysis of high-altitude electromagnetic effect models on power system[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31: 070007 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190184
[11]	Ngwira C M, Pulkkinen A, McKinnell L A, et al. Improved modeling of geomagnetically induced currents in the South African power network[J]. Space Weather, 2008, 6: S11004.
[12]	章鑫, 杜学彬, 刘君. 华北地区地电暴时GIC及涡旋电流响应分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(5):1800-1810. (Zhang Xin, Du Xuebin, Liu Jun. Analysis of GIC and vortex current responses in Huabei region during geoelectric storms[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60(5): 1800-1810 doi: 10.6038/cjg20170516
[13]	李功新, 王倩, 刘连光. 输电线路地磁感应电流常用算法分析与研究[J]. 现代电力, 2005, 22(5):42-46. (Li Gongxin, Wang Qian, Liu Lianguang. Analysis and study of common algorithms for geomagnetic inductive current in grid[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2005, 22(5): 42-46 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2322.2005.05.009
[14]	Wait J R. Wave propagation theory[M]. New York: Pergamon, 1981.
[15]	Chew W C. Waves and fields in inhomogeneous media[M]. New York: IEEE Press, 1995.
[16]	Overbye T J, Shetye K S, Hutchins T R, et al. Power grid sensitivity analysis of geomagnetically induced currents[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(4): 4821-4828. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2274624
[17]	TB 10009-2016, 铁路电力牵引供电设计规范[S]. TB 10009-2016, Code for design of railway traction power supply[S].
[18]	周游. 不同强度地磁暴对高铁牵引网影响的研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2016. Zhou You. Research on the effects of different intensities geomagnetic storms affecting high-speed railway traction network[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2016.
[19]	马骋原. 强磁暴侵害高铁电气一次系统的建模方法研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2015. Ma Chengyuan. Research on modeling method of strong geomagnetic storm impacting on high-speed rail electrical primary system[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2015.
[20]	曹源. 用于电网GIC计算的大地电阻率模型研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2010. Cao Yuan. Earth resistivity modeling method for the evaluation of Geomagnetically Induced Current in power grid[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2010.
[21]	DL/T 437-2012, 高压直流接地极技术导则[S]. DL/T 437-2012, Technical guide of HVDC earth electrode system[S].

Relative Articles

[1]	Zhang Yimo, Yang Biao, Peng Xingyu, Hu Qingyuan, Zhu Xuebin, You Haibo, Zhang Faqiang, Peng Taiping. In-situ calibration of the efficiency of a yttrium activation detection system by the accelerator-based DD fusion neutron source[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2025, 37(1): 016003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202537.240265
[2]	Liu Minjun, Shi Rui, Yang Guang, Wang Bo, Wang Zhou, Zeng Xiong, Yan Chengjie. Research and software design of α particle energy spectrum simulation based on Geant4[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35(12): 126003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202335.230143
[3]	Zhu Wenchao, Lin Hanshang, Zhou Zeran, Jiang Shiping. Development of a neutron monitor based on embedded EPICS[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(2): 026001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.200168
[4]	Li Peng, Qiu Ruiyang, Li Fang, Xu Zhihong, Wang Anxin, Huang Yuling, MENG Ming, Xu Taoguang. CSNS Linac beam current measurement system[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(7): 075101. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180034
[5]	Sun Jilei, Li Fang, Wang Anxin, Xu Taoguang. Design of the wall current monitor system at CSNS rapid cycling synchrotron[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(12): 125103. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180224
[6]	Yan Yucheng, Liu Mingzhe, Fu Yu, Li Wenzhong, Yan Zelin. Numerical calculation of detection efficiency of response functions of Segmented Gamma Scanning system[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(6): 066001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170245
[7]	Xu Yangyang, Tuo Xianguo, Shi Rui, Zheng Honglong, Liu Yuqi. Alpha radioactive source spectrum measurement simulationbased on Monte Carlo method[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(04): 044001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160481
[8]	Li Jin, Zhou Wei, Yao Fei, Yang Su, Zhang Rui. Design research of whole body counter based on Monte Carlo method[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(12): 126005. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170235
[9]	Xu Yangyang, Tuo Xianguo, Shi Rui, Zheng Honglong, Liu Yuqi. Monte Carlo simulation and influencing factors of detection efficiency of PIPS-α spectrometer[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(10): 106002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170108
[10]	Zheng Honglong, Tuo Xianguo, Shi Rui, Zhang Guiyu, Han Qiang, Cheng Yiming. Sourceless efficiency calibration of well-type high purity germanium detector for volume source sample[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(12): 126001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170240
[11]	Li Mingxu, Lei Ming. Simulation of detector efficiency for online liquid gamma monitor XH-3130A with MCNP[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(12): 126010. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170241
[12]	Tian Zining, Ouyang Xiaoping, Han Bin, Chen Wei, Su Chuanying, Liu Wenbiao, Tian Yanjie, Feng Tiancheng. Dynamic calibration method for detection efficiency of radioactive source[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(10): 106002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.151146
[13]	Wei Weiwei, Du Qiang, Wang Li, Yu Xunzhen, Zhang Caixun, Xing Haoyang, Lin Shin-Ted, Tang Changjian, Yue Qian, Zhu Jingjun. Manufacture of gadolinium-doped liquid scintillator detector[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(06): 066001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.066001
[14]	Song Zifeng, Chen Jiabin, Liu Zhongjie, Zhan Xiayu, Tang Qi. Evaluation of uncertainty in DD neutron yield diagnosis by indium activation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(03): 032004. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB201426.032004
[15]	Wen Xianlun, Wei Lai, He Yingling, Zhang Faqiang, Hong Wei, Cao Leifeng, Gu Yuqiu. Calibration of K_α single-photon counting CCD[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(12): 3163-3167. doi: 3163
[16]	Zhang Jinzhao, Tuo Xianguo, Li Zhe, Li Li, Wan Zhixiong. Monte Carlo simulation of radiation measurement of Na activation in blood[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(01): 189-192. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132501.0189
[17]	He ZHexi, Li CHunHua, Qu Huamin, Xu Guanglei, Zou Yiqing. Design of primary stripper foil changer for CSNS/RCS[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(12): 2885-2888. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122412.2885
[18]	Yang Zhaorui, Yuan Ping, Li Zhongwen, Yang Zhihu. L-shell X-ray emission measurement of Au plasma produced by intense femtosecond laser[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(08): 1896-1900. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122408.1896
[19]	liu wei, yan xue-qing, guo zhi-yu, lu yuan-rong, zhu kun, gao shu-li, fang jia-xun, chen jia-er. RFQ accelerator used as neutron source for BNCT[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2007, 19(10): 0- .
[20]	zhang shuang-gen, huang wen-zhong, gu yu-qiu, jiang gang, xiong yong, wen xian-lun, wang guang-chang. Calibration of single-photon counting X-ray CCD[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2006, 18(01): 0- .

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	杨浩，闫二艳，郑强林，鲍向阳，胡海鹰. S波段速调管微波源测控一体化及输出特性. 太赫兹科学与电子信息学报. 2021(01): 71-74 .
2.	熊久良，武占成，孙永卫，毕军建. 多自由度全自动引信辐照实验台的研制与性能测试. 高电压技术. 2017(05): 1715-1721 .
3.	熊久良. 典型米波无线电引信电磁脉冲辐照效应. 高电压技术. 2017(10): 3371-3380 .