Uncertainty prediction of crosstalk measurement for multi-conductor transmission lines

Deng Liting; Zhong Longquan; Liu Qiang; Sun Zihan; Yan Liping; Zhao Xiang

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202133.210066

Volume 33 Issue 8

Aug. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2021 > 33(8): 083002

Li Wenhuai, Wang Junling, Zhang Xiangju, et al. Optimization of periodical physical flux map test[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29: 016004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160199

Citation:

Deng Liting, Zhong Longquan, Liu Qiang, et al. Uncertainty prediction of crosstalk measurement for multi-conductor transmission lines[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 083002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210066

Li Wenhuai, Wang Junling, Zhang Xiangju, et al. Optimization of periodical physical flux map test[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29: 016004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160199

Citation:

PDF( 2881 KB)

Uncertainty prediction of crosstalk measurement for multi-conductor transmission lines

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210066

1.
Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
2.
Institute of Applied Electronics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
3.
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2021-03-05
Rev Recd Date: 2021-07-01

Available Online: 2021-07-21

Publish Date: 2021-08-15

Abstract

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis of cable crosstalk to uncertain parameters is studied using stochastic reduced order model (SROM), and then the uncertainty of cable crosstalk is predicted. To verify the prediction, a three-conductor transmission line (TL) experiment system is established. Both near end and far end crosstalk (NEXT and FEXT) are tested. Then the measurement uncertainty is deduced according to the standard GB/Z 6113.401—2018/CISPR/TR 16-4-1:2009. Comparing the predicted uncertainty to the measured one, it is found that they have the same variation trends with frequency. Moreover, the measured uncertainty is within the range of the prediction. Therefore, the uncertainty prediction using SROM can be applied to predict the test uncertainty, which is instructive to the crosstalk measurement for both analysis model verification and experimental investigation.
- crosstalk experiment,
- stochastic reduced order model (SROM),
- sensitivity,
- uncertainty

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	Yuan K, Grassi F, Spadacini G, et al. Reproducing field-to-wire coupling effects in twisted-wire pairs by crosstalk[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2018, 60(4): 991-1000. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2017.2752231
[2]	郑军奇. EMC电磁兼容设计与测试案例分析[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2010. Zheng Junqi. Electromagnetic compatibility design and test case analysis[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2010
[3]	Dong X, Weng H, Beetner D G, et al. Approximation of worst case crosstalk at high frequencies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2011, 53(1): 202-208. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2010.2081676
[4]	单秦. 高速动车组电磁兼容性关键技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2013: 93-148. Shan Qin. Research on key technologies of electromagnetic compatibility for China railway high-speed[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2013: 93-148
[5]	Grassi F, Abdollahi H, Spadacini G, et al. Radiated immunity test involving crosstalk and enforcing equivalence with field-to-wire coupling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2016, 58(1): 66-74. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2015.2503599
[6]	Chabane S, Besnier P, Klingler M. A modified enhanced transmission line theory applied to multiconductor transmission lines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2017, 59(2): 1-11. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2016.2622018
[7]	Rotgerink J L, Schippers H, Leferink F. Low-frequency analysis of multiconductor transmission lines for crosstalk design rules[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2018, 61(5): 1-9.
[8]	杨清熙, 王庆国, 周星, 等. 有耗地面上架空线缆串扰研究等效电路模型[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2015, 27:083203. (Yang Qingxi, Wang Qingguo, Zhou Xing, et al. Equivalent circuit for crosstalk of overhead cables on lossy ground[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27: 083203 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.083203
[9]	赵翔, 晏奇林, 闫丽萍. 多导体传输线高频场线耦合模型的研究综述[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2015, 27:120201. (Zhao Xiang, Yan Qilin, Yan Liping. Review of high-frequency field-to-line coupling model of multi-conductor transmission line[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27: 120201 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.120201
[10]	叶志红, 廖成, 张敏, 等. 基于时域BLT的多导体传输线串扰响应分析[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2014, 26:073212. (Ye Zhihong, Liao Cheng, Zhang Min, et al. Analysis of crosstalk responses of multi-conductor transmission lines based on time domain BLT equation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26: 073212 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.073212
[11]	石立华, 张琦, 周颖慧, 等. 线束干扰响应的精简计算模型[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2013, 25:531-536. (Shi Lihua, Zhang Qi, Zhou Yinghui, et al. Reduced model for disturbance analysis of cable bundles[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25: 531-536 doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132502.0531
[12]	张丹. 高速动车组电磁兼容预测建模方法及其应用研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2017: 35-54. Zhang Dan. Research on the predicting modeling method of electromagnetic compatibility and its application for EMUs[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2017: 35-54
[13]	张枭啸. 机载线束串扰及场线耦合计算研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2017: 23-48. Zhang Xiaoxiao. Research on calculation of crosstalk and field-to-wire[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2017: 23-48
[14]	Paul C R. Solution of the transmission-line equations for three-conductor lines in homogeneous media[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1978, 20(1): 216-222.
[15]	肖培. 机电设备互连线缆电磁干扰建模及计算方法研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2019: 40-41. Xiao Pei. Study on modeling and calculation method for the electromagnetic interference of interconnection cable in electromechanical equipment[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2019: 40-41
[16]	Xiu D. Efficient collocational approach for parametric uncertainty analysis[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2007, 2(2): 293-309.
[17]	Field R V J, Grigoriu M, Emery J M. On the efficacy of stochastic collocation, stochastic Galerkin, and stochastic reduced order models for solving stochastic problems[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 41: 60-72. doi: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.05.002
[18]	刘青, 王晨东, 李湛宇, 等. 埋地管道HEMP响应的不确定度量化[J]. 电工技术学报, 2019, 34(9):1789-1797. (Liu Qing, Wang Chendong, Li Zhanyu, et al. Uncertainty quantification of response of buried pipeline to high-altitude electromagnetic pulse[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2019, 34(9): 1789-1797
[19]	Fei Z, Huang Y, Zhou J, et al. Sensitivity analysis of cable crosstalk to uncertain parameters using stochastic reduced order models[C]//IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. 2016: 385-389.
[20]	Fei Z, Huang Y, Zhou J, et al. Uncertainty quantification of crosstalk using stochastic reduced order models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2016, 59(1): 228-239.
[21]	李俊辛, 刘强, 闫丽萍, 等. 基于JASMIN的并行CP-FDTD建模与屏蔽效能评估应用[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2019, 31:053202. (Li Junxin, Liu Qiang, Yan Liping, et al. JASMIN-based parallel CP-FDTD modeling and application to shielding effectiveness prediction[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31: 053202 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190026
[22]	GB/Z 6113.401-2018, 无线电骚扰和抗扰度测量设备和测量方法规范(第4-1部分): 不确定度、统计学和限值建模标准化EMC试验的不确定度[S]. GB/Z 6113.401-2018, Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measurement equipment and measurement methods —Part 4-1: Uncertainty, statistics and limit modeling — Uncertainty in standardized EMC tests[S]

Relative Articles

[1]	Tan Xiao, Deng Li, Zhang Lingyu, Li Rui, Fu Yuanguang, Shi Dunfu, Liu Peng, Yang Chao. Development and tests of functions of proton, low-energy photon and electron transport in JMCT3.0 Monte Carlo particle transport program[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36(9): 096002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.240117
[2]	Tan Qun, Fan Jieqing, Zhao Qiang, Zhang Fang, Li Yao, Hao Jianhong, Dong Zhiwei. Three-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation of electron radiation effects on CCD[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(4): 044004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210390
[3]	He Hui, Yu Haijun, Wang Yi, Dai Wenhua. Design of bremsstrahlung target of 4 MeV flash X-ray machine[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31(12): 125102. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190273
[4]	Wang Yi, Li Qin, Dai Zhiyong. Analysis on influence of beam emittance on spatial distribution of exposure using Monte Carlo simulation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(06): 065006. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170029
[5]	Liang Yuqin, Shao Hao, Sun Jun, Huo Shaofei, Bai Xianchen, Zhang Xiaowei. Influence of kinetic energy on energy deposition of incident electron beams in collectors[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(03): 033025. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.033025
[6]	Zhang Liang, Ma Tengyue, Yang Ning, Hu Pan, Song Wei, Liang Yuqin. Electron energy deposition in RBWO collector[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(12): 123008. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.123008
[7]	Wu Sizhong, Zhang Hua, Zhou Cangtao, Wu Junfeng, Cai Hongbo, Cao Lihua, He Minqing, Zhu Shaoping, He Xiantu. Energy deposition of fast electrons in fast ignition[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(03): 032010. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.032010
[8]	Liang Yuqin, Shao Hao, Sun Jun, Yao Zhiming, Huo Shaofei, Zhang Xiaowei. Influence of guiding magnetic field on energy deposition of electrons in collector[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(06): 063010. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.063010
[9]	Huo Shaofei, Sun Jun, Chen Changhua, Liang Yuqin, Wu Ping, Zhang Xiaowei, Bai Xianchen. Preliminary study on space density distribution of intense electron beam in foilless diode[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(04): 043006. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.043006
[10]	Yu Hui, Zin Cho. Comparison of stochastic models in Monte Carlo simulation of coated particle fuels[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(01): 143-146. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132501.0143
[11]	Hu Lin, Lei Yian, Zhu Jun. Simulation on distributed target material impacted by high intensity current multi-pulse electron beam[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(08): 2125-2129. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132508.2125
[12]	Dong Pan, Dai Zhiyong, Xie Yutong, Liao Shuqing, Zhu Jun, Zhuang Huang. Particle-in-cell simulation on focusing of intense electron beam[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(08): 1970-1974. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122408.1970
[13]	Yang Jie, Shu Ting, Zhang Jun, Fan Yuwei, Yang Jianhua, Liu Lie, Yin Yi, Luo Lin. Optical diagnosis system for intense electron beam diode plasma[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(04): 963-967. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122404.0963
[14]	song falun, zhang yonghui, xiang fei, gan yanqing, luo min, kang qiang, li mingjia, ju bingquan, liu zhong. Structure design and experimental study of intense beam diode insulator[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2009, 21(04): 0- .
[15]	liu xi-san. Physics sense of ν/γ parameter in intense relativistic electron beam[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2007, 19(06): 0- .
[16]	liu zhan-jun, zheng chun-yang, li bin, zhu shao-ping, cao li-hua. Energy deposition of relativistic electron beam in plasmas[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2005, 17(01): 0- .
[17]	xia guo xing, xia jia wen, yin xue jun, wu jun xia, liu wei, yang jian cheng, zhao hong wei, wei bao wen. Study on the envelope oscillation of intense electron beam in CSR ecooler system[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2004, 16(03): 0- .
[18]	zhang yong-hui, ma qiao sheng, chang an-bi, zhou chuan-ming, gan yan-qing, liu zhong. Study of repetition rate and intense current electron-beam diodes[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2004, 16(11): 0- .
[19]	yang hai-liang, qiu ai-ci, zhang jia-sheng, huang jian-jun, sun jian-feng. Simulation calculation for the energy deposition profile and the transmission fraction of intense pulsed electron beamat various incident angles[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2002, 14(05): 0- .
[20]	shao hao, liu guo-zhi, song zhi-min, huang weng-hua, hu yong-ei, ning hui. 2-D modification to the current-voltage correlation in inward-emitting coaxial diode[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2001, 13(05): 0- .