Numerical simulation on diagnosis of stimulated Raman scattered electrostatic wave using relativistic electron probe

Lan Ziyue; Pan Kaiqiang; Yang Dong; Li Zhichao; Gong Tao; Li Sanwei; Jiang Xiaohua; Li Qi; Guo Liang; Yang Jiamin; Jiang Shaoen

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202133.210104

Volume 33 Issue 11

Nov. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2021 > 33(11): 112001

Song Xiaozong, Zhou Youxin. Impacting dynamics of ultraviolet induced nanoparticle colloid microjet[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28: 064118. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.064118

Citation:

Lan Ziyue, Pan Kaiqiang, Yang Dong, et al. Numerical simulation on diagnosis of stimulated Raman scattered electrostatic wave using relativistic electron probe[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 112001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210104

Song Xiaozong, Zhou Youxin. Impacting dynamics of ultraviolet induced nanoparticle colloid microjet[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28: 064118. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.064118

Citation:

PDF( 1124 KB)

Numerical simulation on diagnosis of stimulated Raman scattered electrostatic wave using relativistic electron probe

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210104

Laser Fusion Research Center, CAEP, Mianyang 621900, China

Received Date: 2021-03-23
Rev Recd Date: 2021-11-05

Available Online: 2021-11-11

Publish Date: 2021-11-15

Abstract

Abstract

This paper uses the two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulation program EPOCH to verify the feasibility of the relativistic electron beam probe in diagnosing the electrostatic wave generated by stimulated Raman scattering. The results show that the electron beam probe will produce density modulation in the transverse direction of the electron beam probe after passing through the electrostatic wave’s electric field. The density modulation is periodically distributed and moves along the propagation direction of the electrostatic wave. The wavenumber of the density modulation corresponds to the wavenumber of the electrostatic wave. And the moving speed corresponds to the phase speed of the electrostatic wave, so it can be used to deduce the temperature and density of electrons under certain conditions. In the process of diagnosing electrostatic waves, the beam length of the electron beam probe must be shorter than the wavelength of the electrostatic wave or the exposure time of the diagnostic equipment must be less than the period of the electrostatic wave. The research in this paper provides a new method of directly diagnosing the temperature and density of electrostatic waves and electrons, which is of great significance for promoting the experimental research of stimulated Raman scattering and other laser plasma instabilities.
- inertial confinement fusion,
- stimulated Raman scattering,
- particle simulation,
- ultrafast electron probe,
- laser plasma diagnosis

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	张钧, 常铁强. 激光核聚变靶物理基础[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2004: 40-41 Zhang Jun, Chang Tieqiang. Fundaments of the target physics for laser fusion[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2004: 40-41
[2]	Forslund D W, Kindel J M, Lindman E L. Theory of stimulated scattering processes in laser-irradiated plasmas[J]. The Physics of Fluids, 1975, 18(8): 1002-1016. doi: 10.1063/1.861248
[3]	Lindl J D, Amendt P, Berger R L, et al. The physics basis for ignition using indirect-drive targets on the National Ignition Facility[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2004, 11(2): 339-491. doi: 10.1063/1.1578638
[4]	Hinkel D E, Callahan D A, Meezan N B, et al. Analyses of laser-plasma interactions in NIF ignition emulator designs[J]. Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 2010, 244: 022019. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/244/2/022019
[5]	Lindl J. Development of the indirect-drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 1995, 2(11): 3933-4024. doi: 10.1063/1.871025
[6]	Baldis H S, Campbell E M, Kruer W L. Physics of laser plasmas[M]. New York: North-Holland, 1991.
[7]	王传珂, 蒋小华, 王哲斌, 等. 神光II激光装置的全口径背向散射测量系统[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2010, 22(8):1896-1900. (Wang Chuanke, Jiang Xiaohua, Wang Zhebin, et al. Full-aperture backscatter station on Shenguang-II Laser Facility[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(8): 1896-1900 doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20102208.1896
[8]	MacGowan B J, Afeyan B B, Back C A, et al. Laser-plasma interactions in ignition-scale hohlraum plasmas[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 1996, 3(5): 2029-2040. doi: 10.1063/1.872000
[9]	王传珂, 蒋小华, 刘慎业, 等. 2ns, 351 nm激光黑腔靶受激Raman散射实验研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2006, 18(7):1113-1116. (Wang Chuanke, Jiang Xiaohua, Liu Shenye, et al. Stimulated Raman scattering from interaction of 2 ns, 351 nm laser with hohlraum[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2006, 18(7): 1113-1116
[10]	郝亮, 刘占军, 胡晓燕, 等. 黑腔等离子体中SRS与SBS过程的散射光谱分析[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2015, 27:032004. (Hao Liang, Liu Zhanjun, Hu Xiaoyan, et al. Analysis of backscattered light spectra of SRS and SBS in hohlraum plasma[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27: 032004 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.032004
[11]	Glenzer S H, Back C A, Estabrook K G, et al. Observation of two ion-acoustic waves in a two-species laser-produced plasma with Thomson scattering[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 77(8): 1496-1499. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1496
[12]	Glenzer S H, Back C A, Suter L J, et al. Thomson scattering from inertial-confinement-fusion hohlraum plasmas[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1997, 79(7): 1277-1280. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1277
[13]	Glenzer S H, Roznus W, MacGowan B J, et al. Thomson scattering from high-Z laser-produced plasmas[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1999, 82(1): 97-100. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.97
[14]	李志超, 赵航, 龚韬, 等. 激光惯性约束聚变中光学汤姆逊散射研究进展[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2020, 32:092004. (Li Zhichao, Zhao Hang, Gong Tao, et al. Recent research progress of optical Thomson scattering in laser-driven inertial confinement fusion[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2020, 32: 092004
[15]	Kline J L, Montgomery D S, Bezzerides B, et al. Observation of a transition from fluid to kinetic nonlinearities for Langmuir waves driven by stimulated Raman backscatter[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2005, 94: 175003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.175003
[16]	Rousseaux C, Gremillet L, Casanova M, et al. Transient development of backward stimulated Raman and Brillouin scattering on a picosecond time scale measured by subpicosecond Thomson diagnostic[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2006, 97: 015001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.015001
[17]	Zhang C J, Hua J F, Xu X L, et al. Capturing relativistic wakefield structures in plasmas using ultrashort high-energy electrons as a probe[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 29485. doi: 10.1038/srep29485
[18]	Li C K, Séguin F H, Rygg J R, et al. Monoenergetic-proton-radiography measurements of implosion dynamics in direct-drive inertial-confinement fusion[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2008, 100: 225001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.225001
[19]	张超杰. 基于超快电子探针的等离子体尾波场成像研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学工程物理系, 2016 Zhang Chaojie. Probing wakefield structures in plasma based accelerators using femtosecond relativistic electron probes[D]. Beijing: Department of Engineering Physics in Tsinghua University, 2016
[20]	Ward R, Sircombe N J. Fast particle Bremsstrahlung effects in the PIC code EPOCH: enhanced diagnostics for laser-solid interaction modelling[R]. University of Warwick, 2014.

Relative Articles

[1]	Wang Jianguo. Magnetohydrodynamic electromagnetic pulse produced by high altitude nuclear explosion[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36(7): 073001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.240105
[2]	Luo Yong, Pan Qiwen, Yang Shangdong, Gu Zhixing. Preliminary study of lead-bismuth reactor system analysis code development[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35(7): 076003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202335.220369
[3]	Li Chen, Han Ruoyu, Geng Jinyue, Yuan Wei, Cao Yuchen, Ouyang Jiting. Collection method for nanoparticles prepared by electric explosion[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(7): 075014. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.220007
[4]	Liu Zhigang, Zou Xiaobing, Wang Xinxin. Lagrangian magneto-hydrodynamics simulation for underwater electrical wire explosion[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(7): 075002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210433
[5]	Yang Hang, Liu Xiaoyong, Ma Dengqiu, Zhang Yunfei, Huang Wen, He Jianguo. Fluid dynamics analysis method for MRF of first order discontinuous optical elements[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31(2): 022001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.180340
[6]	Liu Wei, Duan Xiaoxi, Yang Weiming, Liu Hao, Zhang Huan, Ye Qing, Sun Liang, Wang Zhebin, Jiang Shaoen. Molecular dynamics simulations of shock response for nano-structure foamed gold[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(5): 052002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170478
[7]	Jiang Zhumin, Zhao Wenbo, Wang Jinyu, Sun Wei, Wang Liangzi. Progress of the CORCA-K space-time neutronics simulation code[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(06): 066003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160279
[8]	Yan Honghao, Zhang Xiaofei, Zhao Bibo, Zhao Tiejun, Li Xiaojie. Characteristics of carbon encapsulated copper nanoparticles based on gaseous/condensed explosives detonation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(08): 084101. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170074
[9]	Wang Chao, Li Xiaoyuan, Luo Qing, Ji Fang, Hu Surong, Wei Qilong, Zhang Yunfei, Huang Wen, Tang Guangping, He Jianguo. Dispersion of SiO₂ nanoparticles in nonaqueous solvent with surfactant[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(02): 024155. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.024155
[10]	Song Xiaozong, Gong Jun. Properties of ultraviolet-visible beam propagation in TiO₂ nanoparticle colloid[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(02): 024110. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.024110
[11]	Shen Shuangyan, Jin Xing. Numerical simulation of MHD magnetic control inlet flow field distribution[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(12): 124008. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.124008
[12]	Li Xiulong, Wan Yongjian, Xu Qinglan, Zhang Yang, Luo Yinchuan, Zhang Rongzhu. Removal effects of waterjet particle impinging in ductile manner[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(05): 051007. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.051007
[13]	Ma Xun, Deng Jianjun, Jiang Ping, Yuan Jianqiang, Liu Jinfeng, Liu Hongwei, Wang Lingyun, Li Hongtao. Review of flash X-ray generator applied to hydrokinetical experiments[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(01): 010201. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB201426.010201
[14]	Zhang Lei, Li Zhongguo, Nie Zhongquan, Yang Junyi, Song Yinglin. Study of excited-state absorption of C₇₀/toluene solution using time-resolved non-degenerate pump-probe system[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(02): 495-499. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132502.0495
[15]	Chen Hua, Tang Wenhui, Ran Xianwen, Xu Zhihong, Zhou Hao, Xu Binbin. Three-dimensional smoothed particle hydrodynamics numerical simulation of laser irradiating columnar aluminum target[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(12): 2802-2806. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122412.2802
[16]	Chang Lihua, Li Zuoyou, Xiao Zhengfei, Zou Liyong, Liu Jinhong, Xiong Xueshi. 高速摄影在流体动力学不稳定性研究中的应用[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(06): 1479-1482. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122406.1479
[17]	gong ding, han feng, wang jian-guo. 2D hydrodynamic simulation of GaAs metal-semiconductor-field-effect-transistor[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2006, 18(07): 0- .
[18]	wang gang-hua, hu xi-jing, kan ming-xuan. Simulation of magnetohydrodynamics for plasma jetting on wire pinch[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2003, 15(10): 0- .
[19]	ning cheng, yang zhen hua, ding ning. Process of radiation magnetohydrodynamics in Al wirearray Zpinch[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2002, 14(06): 0- .

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	宋孝宗，姚统，徐国敏. TiO_2纳米颗粒胶体活化系统设计及流场仿真分析. 兰州理工大学学报. 2020(03): 75-80 .
2.	徐国敏，戴旭杰，姚统，宋孝宗. 余弦光-液耦合喷嘴参数优化及射流抛光实验. 现代制造工程. 2019(05): 52-56 .
3.	张航航，宋孝宗. 矩形光液耦合喷嘴的流场特性分析. 制造业自动化. 2019(12): 31-35 .