Relationship between the geometric characteristics of the polished area and the key parameters of the flow field creation

Yang Hang; Yu Yumin; Zhang Yunfei; Huang Wen; He Jianguo

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202133.210151

Volume 33 Issue 10

Oct. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2021 > 33(10): 101003

Yang Hang, Yu Yumin, Zhang Yunfei, et al. Relationship between the geometric characteristics of the polished area and the key parameters of the flow field creation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 101003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210151

Citation:

Yang Hang, Yu Yumin, Zhang Yunfei, et al. Relationship between the geometric characteristics of the polished area and the key parameters of the flow field creation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 101003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210151

Citation:

PDF( 1416 KB)

Relationship between the geometric characteristics of the polished area and the key parameters of the flow field creation

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210151

1.
School of Engineering, Zunyi Normal University, Zunyi 563006, China
2.
Institute of Mechanical Manufacturing Technology, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China

Received Date: 2021-04-16
Rev Recd Date: 2021-08-25

Available Online: 2021-09-14

Publish Date: 2021-10-15

Abstract

Abstract

In the actual working process of magnetorheological polishing, the difference of the geometric characteristics of the polished area will have a great influence on the key parameters of the flow field creation. However, there is still a lack of research in this area, so this article establishes a three-dimensional model and experimental simulation for this problem. In studying the relationship between the geometric characteristics of the polished area and the key parameters of the flow field creation, first change the shape of the polished area to observe its influence on the shear stress and pressure in the flow field creation; when the shape of the polished area is the same, change the size of the polished area and observe its effect on the shear stress and pressure in the creation of the flow field. It is found that when the shape of the polished area differs, the shear stress is the largest when the polishing area is concave, while it is the smallest when the polished area is convex. When the polished area is convex, the shear stress on both sides of the polished area increases as the curvature of the polished area increases; when the polished area is concave, the shear stress on both sides of the polished area increases as the curvature of the polished area increases. When the shape of the polished area is different, the pressure is maximum when the polished area is concave, and the pressure is minimum when the polished area is convex. When the shape of the polished area is convex, the pressure at the polished area increases as the curvature of the polished area increases; when the shape of the polished area is concave, the pressure at the polished area decreases as the curvature of the polished area increases.
- magnetorheological polishing,
- geometric characteristics,
- shear stress,
- polishing pressure,
- ultra-precision surface

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	Awwal A, Bowers M, Wisoff J, et al. Status of NIF laser and high power laser research at LLNL[C]//SPIE Lase. 2017: 1008403.
[2]	高伟, 魏齐龙, 李晓媛, 等. 磁流变抛光与磁流变液: 原理与研究现状[J]. 磁性材料及器件, 2015, 46(2):68-73. (Gao Wei, Wei Qilong, Li Xiaoyuan, et al. Magnetorheological polishing and magnetorheological fluids: principles and research status[J]. Magnetic Materials and Devices, 2015, 46(2): 68-73 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3830.2015.02.016
[3]	Yin Yuehong, Zhang Yifan, Dai Yifan, et al. Novel magneto-rheological finishing process of KDP crystal by controlling fluid-crystal temperature difference to restrain deliquescence[J]. CIRP Annals, 2018, 67(1): 587-590. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.058
[4]	Jain V K, Ranjan P, Suri V K, et al. Chemo-mechanical magneto-rheological finishing (CMMRF) of silicon for microelectronics applications[J]. CIRP Annals, 2010, 59(1): 323-328. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.106
[5]	Khan D A, Alam Z, Jha S. Nanofinishing of copper using ball end magnetorheological finishing (BEMRF) process[C]//ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 2016.
[6]	张峰, 余景池, 张学军, 等. 磁流变抛光技术[J]. 光学精密工程, 1999, 7(5):1-8. (Zhang Feng, Yu Jingchi, Zhang Xuejun, et al. Magnetorheological polishing technology[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 1999, 7(5): 1-8 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-924X.1999.05.001
[7]	杨建国, 李中会, 李蓓智, 等. 精密磁流变抛光装置的设计与应用[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2010, 2010(9):60-62. (Yang Jianguo, Li Zhonghui, Li Beizhi, et al. Design and application of precision magnetorheological polishing device[J]. Machine Design and Manufacturing, 2010, 2010(9): 60-62 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3997.2010.09.026
[8]	成连民, 李蓓智, 杨建国, 等. 磁流变抛光工艺参数的研究[J]. 机械, 2009, 36(6):11-16. (Cheng Lianmin, Li Beizhi, Yang Jianguo, et al. Research on the process parameters of magnetorheological polishing[J]. Machinery, 2009, 36(6): 11-16
[9]	甄宗坤, 蔡东健. 基于面状几何基元的特征自动提取技术[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2018, 16(2):147-151. (Zhen Zongkun, Cai Dongjian. Automatic feature extraction technology based on planar geometric primitives[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2018, 16(2): 147-151 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1144.2018.02.028
[10]	张云, 冯之敬, 赵广木. 磁流变抛光工具及其去除函数[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 2004(2):190-193. (Zhang Yun, Feng Zhijing, Zhao Guangmu. Magnetorheological polishing tool and its removal function[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition), 2004, 2004(2): 190-193 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0054.2004.02.015
[11]	石峰, 戴一帆, 彭小强, 等. 磁流变抛光过程的材料去除三维模型[J]. 中国机械工程, 2009, 20(6):644-648. (Shi Feng, Dai Yifan, Peng Xiaoqiang, et al. Three-dimensional model of material removal in magnetorheological polishing process[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 20(6): 644-648 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-132X.2009.06.004
[12]	Liu Jiabao, Li Xiaoyuan, Zhang Yunfei, et al. Predicting the material removal rate (MRR) in surface magnetorheological finishing (MRF) based on the synergistic effect of pressure and shear stress[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2020, 504: 144492. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144492
[13]	Chen Mingjun, Liu Henan, Cheng Jian, et al. Model of the material removal function and an experimental study on a magnetorheological finishing process using a small ball-end permanent-magnet polishing head[J]. Applied Optics, 2017, 56(19): 5573-5582. doi: 10.1364/AO.56.005573
[14]	李耀明, 沈兴全, 王爱玲. 磁流变抛光技术的工艺试验[J]. 金刚石与磨料磨具工程, 2009, 2009(5):64-66. (Li Yaoming, Shen Xingquan, Wang Ailing. Process test of magnetorheological polishing technology[J]. Diamond and Abrasive Engineering, 2009, 2009(5): 64-66 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-852X.2009.05.013
[15]	秦北志, 杨李茗, 朱日宏, 等. 光学元件精密加工中的磁流变抛光技术工艺参数[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2013, 25(9):2281-2286. (Qin Beizhi, Yang Liming, Zhu Rihong, et al. Process parameters of magnetorheological polishing technology in precision machining of optical components[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beam, 2013, 25(9): 2281-2286 doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132509.2281
[16]	李发胜, 张平. 抛光用磁流变液的研究[J]. 功能材料, 2006(8):1187-1190. (Li Fasheng, Zhang Ping. Research on magnetorheological fluid for polishing[J]. Functional Materials, 2006(8): 1187-1190 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9731.2006.08.001
[17]	沙树静, 胡锦飞, 张和权. 磁流变抛光技术发展[J]. 机械工程师, 2018, 2018(7):5-8. (Sha Shujing, Hu Jinfei, Zhang Hequan. Development of magnetorheological polishing technology[J]. Mechanical Engineer, 2018, 2018(7): 5-8 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2333.2018.07.002