Optimized simulation of D<sup>3</sup>He proton source for exploding pusher target

Xu Qiuyue; Zhou Jiaxin; Shan Lianqiang; Tian Chao; Yang Zuhua; Zhang Tiankui; Wang Weiwu; Teng Jian; Deng Zhigang; Yuan Zongqiang; Zhang Feng; Qi Wei; Liu Dongxiao; Fan Quanping; Wei Lai; Zhou Weimin; Gu Yuqiu

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202234.220199

Volume 34 Issue 12

Nov. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2022 > 34(12): 122003

Zhang Haoran, Zeng Qin, Chen Chong, et al. Testing and analysis of coupled program of MCNP and FISPACT[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29: 036025. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160424

Citation:

Xu Qiuyue, Zhou Jiaxin, Shan Lianqiang, et al. Optimized simulation of D³He proton source for exploding pusher target[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34: 122003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.220199

Zhang Haoran, Zeng Qin, Chen Chong, et al. Testing and analysis of coupled program of MCNP and FISPACT[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29: 036025. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160424

Citation:

PDF( 5368 KB)

Optimized simulation of D³He proton source for exploding pusher target

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.220199

1.
Science and Technology on Plasma Physics Laboratory, Laser Fusion Research Center, CAEP, Mianyang 621900, China
2.
School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received Date: 2022-06-17
Accepted Date: 2022-10-11
Rev Recd Date: 2022-10-07

Available Online: 2022-10-17

Publish Date: 2022-11-02

Abstract

Abstract

To establish a monochromatic high-energy proton photography platform on high power laser device with hundreds of kilojoules, D³He gas-filled spherical SiO₂ glass pellets, irradiated by an absorbed laser intensity of 10¹⁵ W/cm² have been considered and the exploding pusher target simulation has been conducted with Helios-CR to design an optimum target, which couples to the incident laser light more effectively to produce the optimum number of protons. By varying the inner radius of the target, the laser intensity and the thickness of the spherical shell, the optimal laser conditions and target parameters for photography under the condition of our laser device are obtained. The simulation results give a suitable experimental parameter of 300 μm target ball radius, 1.8 MPa filled D³He gas and 3.5 μm SiO₂ spherical shell thickness. In addition, we also considered the influence of laser driving symmetry and kinetic effect on the simulation results. Taking the optimal parameters obtained by simulation as the input, it is expected that 10⁹–10¹⁰ proton yield can be obtained experimentally. The law of proton yield variation obtained through simulation provides a reference for the formal establishment of the proton photography platform and the selection of experimental parameters.
- direct drive implosion,
- exploding pusher target,
- monochromatic proton source

FullText(HTML)

References(36)

References

[1]	Li C K, Séguin F H, Rygg J R, et al. Monoenergetic-proton-radiography measurements of implosion dynamics in direct-drive inertial-confinement fusion[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2008, 100: 225001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.225001
[2]	Snavely R A, Key M H, Hatchett S P, et al. Intense high-energy proton beams from petawatt-laser irradiation of solids[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2000, 85(14): 2945-2948. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2945
[3]	Zylstra A B, Li C K, Rinderknecht H G, et al. Using high-intensity laser-generated energetic protons to radiograph directly driven implosions[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2012, 83: 013511. doi: 10.1063/1.3680110
[4]	Li C K, Séguin F H, Frenje J A, et al. Charged-particle probing of X-ray–driven inertial-fusion implosions[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5970): 1231-1235. doi: 10.1126/science.1185747
[5]	Craxton R S, Anderson K S, Boehly T R, et al. Direct-drive inertial confinement fusion: a review[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2015, 22: 110501. doi: 10.1063/1.4934714
[6]	Manuel M J E, Zylstra A B, Rinderknecht H G, et al. Source characterization and modeling development for monoenergetic-proton radiography experiments on OMEGA[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2012, 83: 063506. doi: 10.1063/1.4730336
[7]	Rygg J R, Zylstra A B, Séguin F H, et al. Note: a monoenergetic proton backlighter for the National Ignition Facility[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2015, 86: 116104. doi: 10.1063/1.4935581
[8]	Manuel M J E, Li C K, Séguin F H, et al. First measurements of Rayleigh-Taylor-induced magnetic fields in laser-produced plasmas[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2012, 108: 255006. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.255006
[9]	Rigg P A, Schwartz C L, Hixson R S, et al. Proton radiography and accurate density measurements: a window into shock wave processes[J]. Physical Review B, 2008, 77: 220101(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.220101
[10]	Li C K, Séguin F H, Frenje J A, et al. Observation of megagauss-field topology changes due to magnetic reconnection in laser-produced plasmas[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 99: 055001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.055001
[11]	Frenje J A, Grabowski P E, Li C K, et al. Measurements of ion stopping around the Bragg peak in high-energy-density plasmas[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2015, 115: 205001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.205001
[12]	Zylstra A B, Frenje J A, Grabowski P E, et al. Measurement of charged-particle stopping in warm dense plasma[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2015, 114: 215002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.215002
[13]	Zheng Wanguo, Wei Xiaofeng, Zhu Qihua, et al. Laser performance upgrade for precise ICF experiment in SG-Ⅲ laser facility[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2017, 2(5): 243-255. doi: 10.1016/j.mre.2017.07.004
[14]	Séguin F H, Frenje J A, Li C K, et al. Spectrometry of charged particles from inertial-confinement-fusion plasmas[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2003, 74(2): 975-995. doi: 10.1063/1.1518141
[15]	滕建, 赵宗清, 丁永坤, 等. 基于D³He反应产生的单能质子对ICF内爆过程的照相模拟研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2011, 23(1):137-140 doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20112301.0137 Teng Jian, Zhao Zongqing, Ding Yongkun, et al. Simulation of D³He fusion monoenergetic proton radiography of ICF implosions[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(1): 137-140 doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20112301.0137
[16]	MacFarlane J J, Golovkin I E, Woodruff P R. HELIOS-CR – A 1-D radiation-magnetohydrodynamics code with inline atomic kinetics modeling[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2006, 99(1/3): 381-397.
[17]	Miles A R, Chung H K, Heeter R, et al. Numerical simulation of thin-shell direct drive DHe³-filled capsules fielded at OMEGA[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2012, 19: 072702. doi: 10.1063/1.4737052
[18]	Rosenberg M J, Zylstra A B, Séguin F H, et al. A direct-drive exploding-pusher implosion as the first step in development of a monoenergetic charged-particle backlighting platform at the National Ignition Facility[J]. High Energy Density Physics, 2016, 18: 38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.hedp.2016.01.001
[19]	张钧, 姜荣洪, 曾先才. 爆炸推进层靶的理论模型[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 1988, 8(4):207-211 doi: 10.16568/j.0254-6086.1988.04.003 Zhang Jun, Jiang Ronghong, Zeng Xiancai. A theoretical model of exploding pusher targets[J]. Nuclear Fusion and Plasma Physics, 1988, 8(4): 207-211 doi: 10.16568/j.0254-6086.1988.04.003
[20]	Dodd E S, Benage J F, Kyrala G A, et al. The effects of laser absorption on direct-drive capsule experiments at OMEGA[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2012, 19: 042703. doi: 10.1063/1.3700187
[21]	Laffite S, Bourgade J L, Caillaud T, et al. Time history prediction of direct-drive implosions on the Omega facility[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2016, 23: 012706. doi: 10.1063/1.4939833
[22]	Richardson M C, Craxton R S, Delettrez J, et al. Absorption physics at 351 nm in spherical geometry[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1985, 54(15): 1656-1659. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1656
[23]	Storm E K, Larsen J T, Nuckolls J H, et al. Simple scaling model for exploding pusher targets[R]. UCRL-79788, 1977.
[24]	Garban-Labaune C, Fabre E, Max C E, et al. Effect of laser wavelength and pulse duration on laser-light absorption and back reflection[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1982, 48(15): 1018-1021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1018
[25]	Kitagawa Y, Miyanaga N, Kato Y, et al. Optimum design of exploding pusher target to produce maximum neutrons[J]. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 1986, 25(4R): 586-589.
[26]	单连强, 吴凤娟, 袁宗强, 等. 激光惯性约束聚变动理学效应研究进展[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2021, 33:012004 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.200235 Shan Lianqiang, Wu Fengjuan, Yuan Zongqiang, et al. Research progress of kinetic effects in laser inertial confinement fusion[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 012004 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.200235
[27]	Rinderknecht H G, Amendt P A, Wilks S C, et al. Kinetic physics in ICF: present understanding and future directions[J]. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2018, 60: 064001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/aab79f
[28]	Hoffman N M, Zimmerman G B, Molvig K, et al. Approximate models for the ion-kinetic regime in inertial-confinement-fusion capsule implosions[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2015, 22: 052707. doi: 10.1063/1.4921130
[29]	Rosenberg M J, Rinderknecht H G, Hoffman N M, et al. Exploration of the transition from the hydrodynamiclike to the strongly kinetic regime in shock-driven implosions[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2014, 112: 185001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.185001
[30]	Rosenberg M J, Zylstra A B, Séguin F H, et al. Investigation of ion kinetic effects in direct-drive exploding-pusher implosions at the NIF[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2014, 21: 122712. doi: 10.1063/1.4905064
[31]	Rygg J R, Frenje J A, Li C K, et al. Observations of the collapse of asymmetrically driven convergent shocks[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2008, 15: 034505. doi: 10.1063/1.2892025
[32]	Johnson T M, Birkel A, Ramirez H E, et al. Yield degradation due to laser drive asymmetry in D³He backlit proton radiography experiments at OMEGA[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2021, 92: 043551. doi: 10.1063/5.0043004
[33]	Skupsky S, Marozas J A, Craxton R S, et al. Polar direct drive on the National Ignition Facility[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2004, 11(5): 2763-2770. doi: 10.1063/1.1689665
[34]	Tian Chao, Chen Jia, Zhang Bo, et al. High direct drive illumination uniformity achieved by multi-parameter optimization approach: a case study of Shenguang III laser facility[J]. Optics Express, 2015, 23(9): 12362-12372. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.012362
[35]	田超, 单连强, 周维民, 等. 神光Ⅲ原型装置直接驱动均匀辐照设计及在快点火中的潜在应用[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2015, 27:092010 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.092010 Tian Chao, Shan Lianqiang, Zhou Weimin, et al. Optimization of illumination uniformity of Shenguang Ⅲ prototype facility and its potential application in fast ignition[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27: 092010 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.092010
[36]	Ramis R, Temporal M, Canaud B, et al. Three-dimensional symmetry analysis of a direct-drive irradiation scheme for the laser megajoule facility[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2014, 21: 082710. doi: 10.1063/1.4893311

Relative Articles

[1]	Xie Rong, Hao Jianhong, Zhao Qiang, Zhang Fang, Fan Jieqing, Xue Bixi, Dong Zhiwei, Cao Xiangchun. Research on Monte Carlo calculation method for photon absorbed dose[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36(10): 106003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.240037
[2]	Li Kewei, Ling Yongsheng, Zhang Haojia, Shan Qing, Hei Daqian, Jia Wenbao. In-situ detection method of harmful elements in landfill[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(2): 026002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170226
[3]	Li Jie, Li Yunzhao, Wu Hongchun, Zheng Qi. Weighted Monte Carlo solution of neutron kinetics equations[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(1): 016009. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170242
[4]	Shen Jingwen, Hu Ye, Zheng Yu, Ma Xubo. Three-dimensional Monte Carlo transport code JMCT in shielding engineering application[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(4): 046002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170222
[5]	Shao Wencheng, Tang Xiaobin, Geng Changran, Shu Diyun, Gong Chunhui, Ai Yao, Zhang Xudong, Yu Haiyan. Novel magnetic-modulated proton therapy method and corresponding modulation mechanism[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(12): 126015. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170220
[6]	Han Feng, Liu Yu, Wang Bin. Method for evaluating radiation harden performance of electronic system based on system status[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(08): 084001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.150695
[7]	Cheng Zhenbo, Liu Xiaolong, Yan Junkai. Evaluation of uncertainty in peak detector calibration based on Monte-Carlo method[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(11): 113007. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.151066
[8]	Mu Weibing, Zheng Peng, Shi Zhengjun, Liu Jianbo. Rapid interpolation calculation method based on physical rules with MCNP simulation results[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(08): 086002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.086002
[9]	Zhu Jinhui, Xie Honggang, Niu Shengli, Zuo Yinghong. A fast calculation method for Compton current induced by gamma-ray in uniform atmosphere[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(07): 076005. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.076005
[10]	Zhang Jie, Zhang Ying, Chen Xiulian, Pang Beibei, Bai Lixin. Geometric factor calculation program based on Monte Carlo method[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(01): 014002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.014002
[11]	Chen Li, Ma Hao, Zeng Zhi, Li Junli, Cheng Jianping. Monte Carlo-based sourceless efficiency calibration method of HPGe γ spectrometer[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(01): 201-206. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132501.0201
[12]	Zuo Yinghong, Wang Jianguo, . Application of Monte Carlo method to solving boundary value problem of differential equations[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(12): 3023-3027. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122412.3023
[13]	Su Jian, Zeng Zhi, Liu Yue, Yue Qian, Ma Hao, Cheng Jianping. Monte Carlo simulation of muon radiation environment in China Jinping Underground Laboratory[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(12): 3015-3018. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122412.3015
[14]	Zhang Xuan, Huang Jiaofeng, Liu Jun, Guan Yonghong, Liu Jin. Application of Monte Carlo method to boundary location of flash radiographs[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(12): 2983-2986. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122412.2983
[15]	Xie Qin, Geng Changran, Chen Feida, Tang Xiaobin, Yao Ze'en. Calculation of cellular S values for α particle based on Monte Carlo simulation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(12): 2970-2974. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122412.2970
[16]	Chen Feida, Tang Xiaobin, Wang Peng, Chen Da. Neutron shielding material design based on Monte Carlo simulation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(12): 3006-3010. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122412.3006
[17]	Wang Ruihong, Ji Zhicheng, Pei Lucheng. Adaptive sampling method in deep-penetration particle transport problem[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(12): 2941-2945. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122412.2941
[18]	fan ruyu, han feng, guo hongxia. Assessment method of gamma-dose radiation hardness of power supply system[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(02): 0- .
[19]	zhang huabin, zhao xiang, zhou haijing, huang kama. Probabilistic and statistical analysis of mode stirred reverberation chamber and its Monte Carlo simulation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(09): 0- .
[20]	chen nan, li cheng-gang, dai wen-hua, li hong, zhou zhi. Application of Monte Carlo method to spot size measurement of X-ray sources[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2008, 20(06): 0- .

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	刘利，左应红，牛胜利，朱金辉，李夏至. 中子在大气中产生氮俘获γ的蒙特卡罗模拟研究. 强激光与粒子束. 2022(08): 162-168 . 本站查看
2.	王梦琪，郑征，梅其良，黎辉，程汤培. 全局减方差方法在乏燃料干式贮存容器屏蔽计算中的应用. 原子能科学技术. 2019(05): 884-892 .