Comparison of different improvements to mainstream model of nonlinear Compton scattering

Zhang Bo; Zhang Zhimeng; Zhou Weimin

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202335.220204

Volume 35 Issue 1

Jan. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2023 > 35(1): 012007

Shen Zhanpeng, Chen Xiaojuan, Chen Xueqian, et al. Two parameter optimization methods for large aperture mirror[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 062001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180011

Citation:

Zhang Bo, Zhang Zhimeng, Zhou Weimin. Comparison of different improvements to mainstream model of nonlinear Compton scattering[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35: 012007. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202335.220204

Citation:

PDF( 1113 KB)

Comparison of different improvements to mainstream model of nonlinear Compton scattering

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202335.220204

Laser Fusion Research Center, CAEP, Mianyang 621900, China

Received Date: 2022-06-22
Rev Recd Date: 2022-10-17

Available Online: 2022-10-22

Publish Date: 2023-01-15

Abstract

Abstract

Nonlinear Compton scattering is one of the dominant processes in future ultra-short ultra-intense laser-matter interactions. Today, most related researches are based on the mainstream model of nonlinear Compton scattering, which assumes short radiation formation interval, ignores effects of involved laser photon energy and is not spin-resolved. To depict nonlinear Compton scattering more precisely in wider parameter space, improved theories beyond these assumptions have been proposed in recent years. In this paper, we reviewe the major recent improvements, analyze their applicability, discusse their basic characteristics and physical effects on nonlinear Compton scatterings.
- nonlinear Compton scattering,
- polarization,
- energy and momentum of coherent laser photons,
- coherence interval,
- quantum acceleration

FullText(HTML)

References(46)

References

[1]	Danson C N, Brummitt P A, Clarke R J, et al. Vulcan Petawatt—an ultra-high-intensity interaction facility[J]. Nuclear Fusion, 2004, 44(12): S239-S246. doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/44/12/S15
[2]	Weber S, Bechet S, Borneis S, et al. P3: An installation for high-energy density plasma physics and ultra-high intensity laser-matter interaction at ELI-Beamlines[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2017, 2(4): 149-176. doi: 10.1016/j.mre.2017.03.003
[3]	Guo Zhen, Yu Lianghong, Wang Jianye, et al. Improvement of the focusing ability by double deformable mirrors for 10-PW-level Ti: sapphire chirped pulse amplification laser system[J]. Optics Express, 2018, 26(20): 26776-26786. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.026776
[4]	Zou J P, Le Blanc C, Papadopoulos D N, et al. Design and current progress of the Apollon 10 PW project[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2015, 3: e2. doi: 10.1017/hpl.2014.41
[5]	Gales S, Tanaka K A, Balabanski D L, et al. The extreme light infrastructure nuclear physics (ELI-NP) facility: new horizons in physics with 10 PW ultra-intense lasers and 20 MeV brilliant gamma beams[J]. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2018, 81: 094301. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aacfe8
[6]	Bromage J, Bahk S W, Begishev I A, et al. Technology development for ultraintense all-OPCPA systems[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7: e4. doi: 10.1017/hpl.2018.64
[7]	Cartlidge E. The light fantastic[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6374): 382-385. doi: 10.1126/science.359.6374.382
[8]	Tiwari G, Gaul E, Martinez M, et al. Beam distortion effects upon focusing an ultrashort petawatt laser pulse to greater than 10²²W/cm²[J]. Optics Letters, 2019, 44(11): 2764-2767. doi: 10.1364/OL.44.002764
[9]	Zeng Xiaoming, Zhou Kainan, Zuo Yanlei, et al. Multi-petawatt laser facility fully based on optical parametric chirped pulse amplification[J]. Optics Letters, 2017, 42(10): 2014-2017. doi: 10.1364/OL.42.002014
[10]	Yanovsky V, Chvykov V, Kalinchenko G, et al. Ultra-high intensity-300-TW laser at 0.1 Hz repetition rate[J]. Optics Express, 2008, 16(3): 2109-2114. doi: 10.1364/OE.16.002109
[11]	Pirozhkov A S, Fukuda Y, Nishiuchi M, et al. Approaching the diffraction-limited, bandwidth-limited petawatt[J]. Optics Express, 2017, 25(17): 20486-20501. doi: 10.1364/OE.25.020486
[12]	Yoon J W, Jeon C, Shin J, et al. Achieving the laser intensity of 5.5×10²²W/cm² with a wavefront-corrected multi-PW laser[J]. Optics Express, 2019, 27(15): 20412-20420. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.020412
[13]	Yoon J W, Yoon J W, Kim Y G, et al. Realization of laser intensity over 10²³W/cm²[J]. Optica, 2021, 8(5): 630-635. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.420520
[14]	Danson C N, Haefner C, Bromage J, et al. Petawatt and exawatt class lasers worldwide[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7: e54. doi: 10.1017/hpl.2019.36
[15]	Jackson J D. Classical electrodynamics[M]. New York: Wiley Press, 1975.
[16]	Landau L D, Lifshitz E M. The classical theory of fields[M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1975.
[17]	Schwinger J. On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization[J]. Physical Review, 1951, 82(5): 664-679. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.82.664
[18]	Klein J J, Nigam B P. Birefringence of the vacuum[J]. Physical Review, 1964, 135(5B): B1279-B1280. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.135.B1279
[19]	Adler S L, Bahcall J N, Callan C G, et al. Photon splitting in a strong magnetic field[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1970, 25(15): 1061-1065. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.1061
[20]	Unruh W G. Notes on black-hole evaporation[J]. Physical Review D, 1976, 14(4): 870-892. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.870
[21]	Zhang Bo, Zhang Zhimeng, Hong Wei, et al. Vacuum radiation induced by time dependent electric field[J]. Physics Letters B, 2017, 767: 431-436. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.076
[22]	Marklund M, Shukla P K. Nonlinear collective effects in photon-photon and photon-plasma interactions[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2006, 78(2): 591-640. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.591
[23]	Ehlotzky F, Krajewska K, Kamiński J Z. Fundamental processes of quantum electrodynamics in laser fields of relativistic power[J]. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2009, 72: 046401. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/72/4/046401
[24]	Di Piazza A, Müller C, Hatsagortsyan K Z, et al. Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2012, 84(3): 1177-1228. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1177
[25]	Mourou G, Tajima T. Summary of the IZEST science and aspiration[J]. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 2014, 223(6): 979-984. doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2014-02148-4
[26]	Cole J M, Behm K T, Gerstmayr E, et al. Experimental evidence of radiation reaction in the collision of a high-intensity laser pulse with a laser-wakefield accelerated electron beam[J]. Physical Review X, 2018, 8: 011020.
[27]	Poder K, Tamburini M, Sarri G, et al. Experimental signatures of the quantum nature of radiation reaction in the field of an ultraintense laser[J]. Physical Review X, 2018, 8: 031004.
[28]	Wistisen T N, Di Piazza A, Knudsen H V, et al. Experimental evidence of quantum radiation reaction in aligned crystals[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 795. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03165-4
[29]	Wistisen T N, Di Piazza A, Nielsen C F, et al. Quantum radiation reaction in aligned crystals beyond the local constant field approximation[J]. Physical Review Research, 2019, 1: 033014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033014
[30]	Nikishov A I, Ritus V I. Quantum processes in the field of a plane electromagnetic wave and in a constant field. Part II[J]. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz, 1964, 46: 776.
[31]	Nikishov A I, Ritus V I. Pair production by a photon and photon emission by an electron in the field of an intense electromagnetic wave and in a constant field[J]. Soviet Physics JETP, 1967, 25(6): 1135-1142.
[32]	Ritus V I. Quantum effects of the interaction of elementary particles with an intense electromagnetic field[J]. Journal of Soviet Laser Research, 1985, 6(5): 497-617. doi: 10.1007/BF01120220
[33]	Ji Liangliang, Pukhov A, Kostyukov I Y, et al. Radiation-reaction trapping of electrons in extreme laser fields[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2014, 112: 145003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.145003
[34]	Gonoskov A, Bashinov A, Gonoskov I, et al. Anomalous radiative trapping in laser fields of extreme intensity[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2014, 113: 014801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.014801
[35]	Duclous R, Kirk J G, Bell A R. Monte Carlo calculations of pair production in high-intensity laser–plasma interactions[J]. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2011, 53: 015009. doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/53/1/015009
[36]	Arber T D, Bennett K, Brady C S, et al. Contemporary particle-in-cell approach to laser-plasma modelling[J]. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2015, 57: 113001. doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/57/11/113001
[37]	Ridgers C P, Kirk J G, Duclous R, et al. Modelling gamma-ray photon emission and pair production in high-intensity laser–matter interactions[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 260: 273-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.12.007
[38]	Zhang Bo, Zhang Zhimeng, Deng Zhigang, et al. Effects of involved laser photons on radiation and electron-positron pair production in one coherence interval in ultra intense lasers[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 16862. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35312-8
[39]	Zhang Bo, Zhang Zhimeng, Deng Zhigang, et al. Quantum mechanisms of electron and positron acceleration through nonlinear Compton scatterings and nonlinear Breit-Wheeler processes in coherent photon dominated regime[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 18876. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55472-5
[40]	Li Yanfei, Shaisultanov R, Hatsagortsyan K Z, et al. Ultrarelativistic electron-beam polarization in single-shot interaction with an ultraintense laser pulse[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2019, 122: 154801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.154801
[41]	Li Yanfei, Shaisultanov R, Chen Y Y, et al. Polarized ultrashort brilliant multi-GeV γ rays via single-shot laser-electron interaction[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2020, 124: 014801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.014801
[42]	Li Yanfei, Chen Yueyue, Wang Weimin, et al. Production of highly polarized positron beams via helicity transfer from polarized electrons in a strong laser field[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2020, 125: 044802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.044802
[43]	McMaster W H. Matrix representation of polarization[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1961, 33(1): 8-27. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.33.8
[44]	Baier V N, Katkov V M, Strakhovenko V M. Quantum radiation theory in inhomogeneous external fields[J]. Nuclear Physics B, 1989, 328(2): 387-405. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(89)90334-9
[45]	Dinu V, Harvey C, Ilderton A, et al. Quantum radiation reaction: from interference to incoherence[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2016, 116: 044801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.044801
[46]	Di Piazza A, Tamburini M, Meuren S, et al. Implementing nonlinear Compton scattering beyond the local-constant-field approximation[J]. Physical Review A, 2018, 98: 012134. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012134

Relative Articles

[1]	Zhu Xiangqin, Wu Wei, Cai Libing. Simulation and optimization of novel movable TEM horn radiating-wave simulator[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36(7): 073002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.240093
[2]	Zhao Jinglin, Wang Zhiqiang, Wang Jinjun, Zhang Dongdong, Li Guofeng. Deposited energy optimization analysis of discharge in water based on Kriging model[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35(3): 035005. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202335.220240
[3]	Li Qiong, Liu Zijing, Xiao Hao, XiaoYingjie, Zhao Pengcheng, Wang Chang, Yu Tao. Intelligent optimization method for lead-bismuth reactor based on Kriging surrogate model[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(5): 056007. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210560
[4]	Liang Xiuqiang, Yuan Jiehong, Zhou Shiming. Simulation and experimental study on temperature field of ion thruster's grids assembly[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30(11): 114001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.180208
[5]	Wan Haixia, Xu Zhilong, Shao Jing, Sun Zheng, Li Long, Wu Xiaochun. Primary design and optimization of shielding for nuclear medical ship reactor[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(01): 016010. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160235
[6]	Cui Ding, Ma She, Li Caiyang, Ye Changchun. Dynamical model modification of optical mirror holder based on sensitivity analysis[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26(07): 071003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.071003
[7]	Huang Zuxin, Hu Xiaoyang, Zhou Wenchao, Tian Xiaoqiang. Development of thin film’s weak absorption testing set-up[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(S0): 13-18.
[8]	Wang Qiang, Zhao Hailong, Dai Zhiyong, Sun Wensui, Xie Long, Wang Wendou. Optimization of beam transport magnetic field in linear induction accelerator based on genetic algorithm[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(05): 1256-1260. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132505.1256
[9]	li chunbo, yu chunhui, chai jinlong, liang yexing, liu chunping, wang hongzhi, li jingzhen, huang hongbin. Design of rotating mirror for ultra-high speed camera based on dynamic characteristic[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(12): 50-51.
[10]	yu xiaohui, yang hanwu, zhang zicheng, wang wei. Design of repetitive pulsing and guiding magnetic field[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(05): 0- .
[11]	jia huaiting, feng bin, li fuquan, xiang yong, wang fang, han wei, li keyu. Wave-front reconstruction from intensity distributions near focal plane[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(05): 0- .
[12]	wu hanyu, cong peitian, guo ning, sun tieping, zhang guowei. Optimization design of electromagnetic field of multigap gas switch[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2010, 22(12): 0- .
[13]	zhang jun-wei, zhou yi, zhou hai, wang shi-long, jing feng, feng bin, lin dong-hui. Influences of switchyard mirror mount on beam direction under micro vibration excitation[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2008, 20(05): 0- .
[14]	he xiao-zhong, yang guo-jun, liu cheng-jun. Optimization research on image lens of proton radiography[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2008, 20(02): 0- .
[15]	wu wen-zhuang, zhao gang, li shi, yin he-jun. Design and optimization of electron gun used in high efficiency travelling wave tube[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2007, 19(04): 0- .
[16]	xia hai-yun, sun dong-song, shen fa-hua, dong jing-jing. Optimization of etalon parameters in direct detection Doppler wind lidar[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2006, 18(11): 0- .
[17]	wang li, li hong-fu, niu xin-jian, zhao-qing. Influence of the design parameters of magnetic injection gun on it's performance[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2004, 16(06): 0- .
[18]	wang li, li hong-fu, niu xin-jian, deng xue. Analysis of the influence of the magnetic field profiles on the high-power gyrotron's magnetic injection gun[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2003, 15(12): 0- .
[19]	cheng cheng. Optimization of five gas admixtures in a CO2 laser[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2002, 14(01): 0- .

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	时英钟，邵帅，邵明振. 大口径激光发射窗口镜多点支撑下结构研究. 机械设计与制造. 2024(07): 145-150 .
2.	郑胜亨，马文静，杨英，曹庭分，陈晓娟，郭雨源，廖予祯，张鑫，韩伟，邓学伟，胡东霞. 大口径反射镜低应力夹持技术. 强激光与粒子束. 2021(09): 10-15 . 本站查看
3.	孙奇，宫雪非. 基于混合优化方法的大口径主镜设计. 光学学报. 2020(22): 114-121 .
4.	丁锴铖，连华东，蔺宇辉. 基于等效模型的多层蜂窝堆栈ULE反射镜优化设计研究. 光学技术. 2019(01): 16-20 .
5.	黎代维，胡绍全，陈学前，陈晓娟. 大口径反射镜背部支撑结构的响应面优化方法. 强度与环境. 2019(01): 42-48 .