Wang Weining, Wang Feng, Jiang Shao’en, et al. Accuracy examination of shock speed measurement by imaging velocity interferometer system for any reflector[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24: 2121-2124. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20122409.2121
Citation: Chang Hao, Jin Xing, Wen Ming, et al. Analytical model for calculating laser ablation impulse coupling coefficient[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25: 1110-1114. doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132505.1110

Analytical model for calculating laser ablation impulse coupling coefficient

doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20132505.1110
  • Received Date: 2012-10-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2012-12-03
  • Publish Date: 2013-03-12
  • Laser radiation has been considered as one kind of feasible methods to clean space debris. Impulse coupling coefficient is an important parameter to calculate the clean effects. An analytical model for calculating laser ablation impulse coupling coefficient is put forward. The impulse coupling coefficients in vapor mechanism and plasma mechanismare connected by the ionization fraction. Therefore, a unified model of impulse coupling coefficient is set up. The relationship of laser intensity, ionization fraction and impulse coupling coefficient is obtained with Al, the most common material of space debris, as the calculation example. The transition between vapor mechanism and plasma mechanism progressively changes with the increase of laser intensity. The ionization fraction is also increasing until the vapor is totallyionized. The impulse coupling coefficient increases at first, then reaches the maximum, and decreases at last. The optimum impulse coupling coefficient is obtained when the plasma mechanism dominates.
  • Relative Articles

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 25.8 %FULLTEXT: 25.8 %META: 73.5 %META: 73.5 %PDF: 0.6 %PDF: 0.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.1 %其他: 2.1 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %上海: 0.4 %上海: 0.4 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %北京: 12.2 %北京: 12.2 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %普洱: 0.1 %普洱: 0.1 %杭州: 3.1 %杭州: 3.1 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 8.2 %芒廷维尤: 8.2 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 70.2 %西宁: 70.2 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %费利蒙: 0.8 %费利蒙: 0.8 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %其他ChinaIndia上海中山北京台州合肥哥伦布大同天津广州张家口成都普洱杭州武汉深圳湖州漯河石家庄秦皇岛芒廷维尤苏州衢州西宁西安费利蒙长沙长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (1960) PDF downloads(733) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return